Research Progress in the Effects of Proton Acceptor/Donor on Electrocatalytic Reactions

doi:10.19894/j.issn.1000-0518.220316

Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 666-680.DOI: 10.19894/j.issn.1000-0518.220316

• Review • Previous Articles Next Articles

Research Progress in the Effects of Proton Acceptor/Donor on Electrocatalytic Reactions

Feng ZHU¹^,², Xiao-Lian PENG¹, Wen-Bin ZHANG¹^,²()

^1.College of Chemistry and Bio-engineering，Yichun University，Yichun 336000，China
^2.Key Laboratory of Jiangxi University of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Biology，Yichun 336000，China

Received:2022-09-27 Accepted:2023-02-18 Published:2023-05-01 Online:2023-05-26
Contact: Wen-Bin ZHANG
About author:zhangwbycu@163.com
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21962019)

Abstract

Abstract:

Proton donors or acceptors are important participants in several important electrocatalytic reactions， it has been proved that species and concentration of proton donor/acceptor can induce significant impact on the electrocatalytic reaction rate and even product species. Starting from the demonstration of typical reaction mechanisms of electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution， electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide， electrocatalytic oxygen evolution and alcohol electrooxidation to produce aldehyde/ketone， this mini-review summarized proton donor/acceptor species and proton transfer pathway etc. in these four electrocatalytic reactions， and discussed their effects on the efficiency of the electrocatalytic reactions.

Key words: Proton donor/acceptor, Hydrogen evolution, Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide, Oxygen evolution, Alcohol electrooxidation

CLC Number:

O646

Feng ZHU, Xiao-Lian PENG, Wen-Bin ZHANG. Research Progress in the Effects of Proton Acceptor/Donor on Electrocatalytic Reactions[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2023, 40(5): 666-680.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig.1 Framework diagram of proton donor/acceptor effects on electrocatalytic reactions

Fig.2 General mechanism of electrochemical hydrogen evolution［12］

Fig.3 （a） Cyclic voltammograms for hydrogen evolution with the addition of different buffer species， measurement system： 1.0 μmol/L CoMC6*a， 50 mmol/L of the buffer， 100 mmol/L KCl， and a pH of 6.5， A glassy carbon counter electrode， Ag/AgCl （1 mol/L KCl） reference electrode， and hanging drop mercury electrode；（b） Molecular structure of different buffer species；（c） A plot of catalytic potential values as a function of buffer acid pKa， Region 1 has a slope of -128 mV/pKa unit （pKa： 1~8）， and region 2 has a slope of -39 mV/pKa unit （pKa： 8~12）［15］

Fig.4 Schematic of steric effect in electrochemical hydrogen evolution at polycrystalline gold electrode in acetonitrile electrolyte［16］

Fig.5 Schematic view of proton sources （intermolecular or intramolecular） comparison in electrochemical hydrogen evolution for iron porphyrin catalyst［25］

Fig.6 Proton transfer assisted by crown ether-constructed hydrogen bond network［26］

Fig.7 Schematic diagram of CO2 electrochemical reduction mechanism［28］

Fig.8 Linear scans of［Mn（Mes-bpy）（CO）3Br］ under saturated CO2 atmosphere in CH3CN with 0.1 mol/L NBu4PF6 with various amounts of added H2O［33］

Fig.9 Molecular structure of a series of iron porphyrins［34-36］

Fig.10 Schematic view of the phenol group-based proton relay in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction with Re-bipyridine complexes［40］

Fig.11 Possible electrocatalytic reduction mechanism of CO2 using CuBtz［46］

Fig.12 General mechanism of electrochemical oxygen evolution using metal or metal oxide catalyst［48-50］

Fig.13 The proposed rate determining step for oxygen evolution by borate doped nickel hydroxide［52］

Fig.14 Step mechanism and concerted mechanism of proton coupled electron transfer during metal oxide mediated oxygen evolution［57-58］

Fig.15 Schematic diagram of oxygen evolution mechanism of perovskite oxide type catalyst with （a） a traditional proton acceptor and （b） a molecular-level proton acceptor［65-66］

Fig.16 Proposed electrocatalytic reaction of TEMPO-mediated alcohol oxidation［67］

Fig.17 （a） CVs of 2.0 mmol/L NHPI in the presence of 10.0 mmol /L benzyl alcohol （a） with the addition of different amounts of water，（b） in the presence of different concentration of 2，6-lutidine，（c） suggested mechanism of NHPI-mediated electrooxidation of alcohols［72］

References 74

1	HOLADE Y， SERVAT K， TINGRY S. Advances in electrocatalysis for energy conversion and synthesis of organic molecules［J］. ChemPhysChem， 2017， 18： 2573-2605.
2	AKHADE S A， SINGH N， GUTIERREZ O Y， et al. Electrocatalytic hydrogenation of biomass-derived organics： a review［J］. Chem Rev， 2020， 120（20）： 11370-11419.
3	HOLADE Y， TULEUSHOVA N， TINGRY S， et al. Recent advances in the electrooxidation of biomass-based organic molecules for energy， chemicals and hydrogen production［J］. Catal Sci Tech， 2020， 10（10）： 3071-3112.
4	CHENG W， SUN L， HE X， et al. Recent advances in fuel cell reaction electrocatalysis based on porous noble metal nanocatalysts［J］. Dalton Trans， 2022， 51： 7763-7774.
5	LIU Y， LIANG X， GU L， et al. Corrosion engineering towards efficient oxygen evolution electrodes with stable catalytic activity for over 6000 hours［J］. Nat Commun， 2018， 9： 2609.
6	DATTILA F， SEEMAKURTHI R R， ZHOU Y. Modeling operando electrochemical CO₂ reduction［J］. Chem Rev， 2022， 122（12）： 11085-11130.
7	WARBURTON R E， SOUDACKOV A V， HAMMES-SCHIFFER S. Theoretical modeling of electrochemical proton-coupled electron transfer［J］. Chem Rev， 2022， 122（12）： 10599-10650.
8	AGARWAL R G， COSTE S C， GROFF B D， et al. Free energies of proton-coupled electron transfer reagents and their applications［J］. Chem Rev， 2022， 122（1）： 1-49.
9	ZHANG X， LI Y， GUO P. Theory on optimizing the activity of electrocatalytic proton coupled electron transfer reactions［J］. J Catal， 2019， 376： 17-24.
10	孙世刚. 电催化纳米材料［M］. 北京：化学工业出版社， 2018.
	SUN S G. Nanostructured electrocatalysts［M］. Beijing： Chemical Industry Press， 2018.
11	ZHANG X， LI Y， GUO P， et al. Theory on optimizing the activity of electrocatalytic proton coupled electron transfer reactions［J］. J Catal， 2019， 376： 17-24.
12	ZHU J， HU L， ZHAO P， et al. Recent advances in electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution using nanoparticles［J］. Chem Rev， 2019， 120（2）： 851-918.
13	LAMOUREUX P S， SINGH A R， CHAN K. pH effects on hydrogen evolution and oxidation over Pt（111）： insights from first-principles［J］. ACS Catal， 2019， 9（7）： 6194-6201.
14	ALVAREZ-HERNANDEZ J， SOPCHAK A， BREN K. Buffer pK_a impacts the mechanism of hydrogen evolution catalyzed by a cobalt porphyrin-peptide［J］. Inorg Chem， 2020， 59（12）： 8061-8069.
15	LE J， ALACHOUZOS G， FRONTIER A， et al. Tuning mechanism through buffer dependence of hydrogen evolution catalyzed by a cobalt mini-enzyme［J］. Biochemistry， 2020， 59（12）： 1289-1297.
16	JACKSON M N， SURENDRANATH Y. Donor-dependent kinetics of interfacial proton-coupled electron transfer［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2016， 138（9）： 3228-3234.
17	CLARY K E， KARAYILAN M， MCCLEARY-PETERSEN K C， et al. Increasing the rate of the hydrogen evolution reaction in neutral water with protic buffer electrolytes［J］. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA， 2020（52）： 3737-3743.
18	JACKSON M N， JUNG O， LAMOTTE H C， et al. Donor-dependent promotion of interfacial proton-coupled electron transfer in aqueous electrocatalysis［J］. ACS Catal， 2019， 9（4）： 3737-3743.
19	HOD I， DERIA P， BURY W， et al. A porous proton-relaying metal-organic framework material that accelerates electrochemical hydrogen evolution［J］. Nat Commun， 2015， 6： 8304.
20	DOLUI D， GHORAI S， DUTTA A. Tuning the reactivity of cobalt-based H₂ production electrocatalysts via the incorporation of the peripheral basic functionalities［J］. Coordin Chem Rev， 2020， 416： 213335.
21	刘涛，张清鑫，郭鸿波，等. 金属卟啉类化合物在电催化氧还原反应的应用［J］. 中国科学：化学， 2022， 52（8）： 1306-1320.
	LIU T， ZHANG Q X， GUO H B， et al. Electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction with metalloporphyrins［J］. Sci China-Chem， 2022， 52（8）： 1306-1320.
22	WIEDNER E S， APPEL A M， RAUGEI S， et al. Molecular catalysts with diphosphine ligands containing pendant amines［J］. Chem Rev， 2022， 122（14）： 12427-12474.
23	ROUBELAKIS M M， BEDIAKO D K， DOGUTAN D K， et al. Proton-coupled electron transfer kinetics for the hydrogen evolution reaction of hangman porphyrins［J］. Energy Environ Sci， 2012， 5： 7737-7740.
24	THAMMAVONGSY Z， MERCER I P， YANG J Y. Promoting proton coupled electron transfer in redox catalysts through molecular design［J］. Chem Commun， 2019， 55（70）： 10342-10358.
25	BHUNIA S， RANA A， HEMATIAN S， et al. Proton relay in iron porphyrins for hydrogen evolution reaction［J］. Inorg Chem， 2021， 60（18）： 13876-13887.
26	LI X L， LV B， ZHANG X P， et al. Introducing water-network-assisted proton transfer for boosted electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution with cobalt corrole［J］. Angew Chem Int Ed， 2022， 61（9）： 202114310.
27	FRANCKE R， SCHILLE B， ROEMELT M， et al. Homogeneously catalyzed electroreduction of carbon dioxide-methods， mechanisms， and catalysts［J］. Chem Rev， 2018， 118（9）： 4631-4701.
28	ZHANG R， WU B， LI Q， et al. Design strategies and mechanism studies of CO₂ electroreduction catalysts based on coordination chemistry［J］. Coord Chem Rev， 2020， 422： 213436.
29	ANGAMUTHU R， BYERS P， LUTZ M， et al. Electrocatalytic CO₂ conversion to oxalate by a copper complex［J］. Science， 2010， 327（5963）： 313-315.
30	CHU A T， SURENDRANATH Y. Aprotic solvent exposes an altered mechanism for copper-catalyzed ethylene electrosynthesis［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2022， 144（12）： 5359-5365.
31	RUDNEV A V， ZHUMAEV U E， KUZUME A， et al. The promoting effect of water on the electroreduction of CO₂ in acetonitrile［J］. Electrochim Acta， 2016， 189： 38-44.
32	FIGUEIREDO M C， LEDEZMA-YANEZ I， KOPER M. In situ spectroscopic study of CO₂ electroreduction at copper electrodes in acetonitrile［J］. ACS Catal， 2016， 6（4）： 2382-2392.
33	SAMPSON M D， NGUYEN A D， GRICE K A. et al. Manganese catalysts with bulky bipyridine ligands for the electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide： eliminating dimerization and altering catalysis［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2014， 136（14）： 5460-5471.
34	BHUGUN I， LEXA D， SAVÉANT J M， et al. Catalysis of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide by iron（0） porphyrins. synergistic effect of lewis acid cations［J］. J Phys Chem B， 1996， 100（51）： 19981-19985.
35	COSTENTIN C， DROUET S， ROBERT M， et al. A local proton source enhances CO₂ electroreduction to CO by a molecular Fe catalyst［J］. Science， 2012， 338（6103）： 90-94.
36	ZHOU Y， XIAO Y， ZHAO J. A local proton source from carboxylic acid functionalized metal porphyrins for enhanced electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction［J］. New J Chem， 2020， 44： 16062-16068.
37	ZHAO Y J， ZHENG L L， JIANG D， et al. Nanoengineering metal-organic framework-based materials for use in electrochemical CO₂ reduction reactions［J］. Small， 2021， 17（16）： 2006590.
38	HUI S R， LUNA P D. How increasing proton and electron conduction benefits electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction［J］. Matter， 2021， 4（5）： 1555-1577.
39	NICHOLS A W， HOOE S L， KUEHNER J S， et al. Electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction to formate with molecular Fe（III） complexes containing pendent proton relays［J］. Inorg Chem， 2020， 59（9）： 5854-5864.
40	YANG Y， ZHANG Z Y， ZHANG Z Y， et al. Electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction with Re-based spiro bipyridine complexes： effects of the local proton in the second coordination sphere［J］. Chin J Chem， 2021， 39（5）： 1281-1287.
41	CHAPOVETSKY A， WELBORN M， LUNA J M， et al. Pendant hydrogen-bond donors in cobalt catalysts independently enhance CO₂ reduction［J］. ACS Central Sci， 2018， 4（3）： 397-404.
42	DERRICK J S， LOIPERSBERGER M， NISTANAKI S K， et al. Templating bicarbonate in the second coordination sphere enhances electrochemical CO₂ reduction catalyzed by iron porphyrins［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2022， 144（26）： 11656-11663.
43	SIEWERT I. Electrochemical CO₂ reduction catalyzed by binuclear LRe₂（CO）₆Cl₂ and LMn₂（CO）₆Br₂ complexes with an internal proton source［J］. Acc Chem Res， 2022， 55（4）： 473-483.
44	WILTING A， STOLPER T， MATA R A， et al. Dinuclear rhenium complex with a proton responsive ligand as a redox catalyst for the electrochemical CO₂ reduction［J］. Inorg Chem， 2017， 56（7）： 4176-4185.
45	FOKIN I， DENISIUK A， WÜRTELE C， et al. The impact of a proton relay in binuclear α-diimine-Mn（CO）₃ complexes on the CO₂ reduction catalysis［J］. Inorg Chem， 2019， 58（16）： 10444-10453.
46	ZHU H L， CHEN H Y， HAN Y X， et al. A porous π-π stacking framework with dicopper（I） sites and adjacent proton relays for electroreduction of CO₂ to C₂₊ products［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2022， 144（29）： 13319-13326.
47	MIYAMOTO K， ASAHI R. Water facilitated electrochemical reduction of CO₂ on cobalt-porphyrin catalysts［J］. J Phys Chem C， 2019， 123（15）： 9944-9948.
48	BLAKEMORE J D， CRABTREE R H， BRUDVIG G W. Molecular catalysts for water oxidation［J］. Chem Rev， 2015， 115（23）： 12974-13005.
49	MAN I C， SU H Y， CALLE-VALLEJO F， et al. Universality in oxygen evolution electro-catalysis on oxide surfaces［J］. ChemCatChem， 2011， 3（7）： 1159-1165.
50	GIORDANO L， HAN B， RISCH M， et al. pH dependence of OER activity of oxides： current and future perspectives［J］. Catal Today， 2016， 262（15）： 2-10.
51	COGGINS M K， ZHANG M， CHEN Z， et al. Single-site copper（II） water oxidation electrocatalysis： rate enhancements with HPO 4 2 - as a proton acceptor at pH 8［J］. Angew Chem Int Ed， 2014， 53（45）： 12226-12230.
52	ZHANG Z， ZHANG T， LEE J Y. The enhancement effect of borate doping on the oxygen evolution activity of α-nickel hydroxide［J］. ACS Appl Nano Mater， 2018， 1（2）： 751-758
53	MAVROS M G， TSUCHIMOCHI T， KOWALCZYK T， et al. What can density functional theory tell us about artificial catalytic water splitting？［J］. Inorg Chem， 2014， 53（13）： 6386-6397.
54	GERKEN J B， MCALPIN J G， CHEN J Y C， et al. Electrochemical water oxidation with cobalt-based electrocatalysts from pH 0~14： the thermodynamic basis for catalyst structure， stability， and activity［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2011， 133（36）： 14431-14442.
55	SURENDRANATH Y， KANAN M W， NOCERA D G. Mechanistic studies of the oxygen evolution reaction by a cobalt-phosphate catalyst at neutral pH［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2010， 132（46）： 16501-16509.
56	BEDIAKO D K， SURENDRANATH Y， NOCERA D G. Mechanistic studies of the oxygen evolution reaction mediated by a nickel-borate thin film electrocatalyst［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2013， 135（9）： 3662-3674.
57	YAMAGUCHI A， INUZUKA R， TAKASHIMA T， et al. Regulating proton-coupled electron transfer for efficient water splitting by manganese oxides at neutral pH［J］. Nat Comm， 2014， 5： 4256.
58	TAKASHIMA T， ISHIKAWA K， IRIE H. Efficient oxygen evolution on hematite at neutral pH enabled by proton-coupled electron transfer［J］. Chem Comm， 2016， 52（97）： 14015-14018.
59	TAKASHIMA T， ISHIKAWA K， IRIE H. Induction of concerted proton-coupled electron transfer during oxygen evolution on hematite using lanthanum oxide as a solid proton acceptor［J］. ACS Catal， 2019， 9（10）： 9212-9215.
60	DOGUTAN D K， MCGUIREJR R， NOCERA D G. Electrocatalytic water oxidation by cobalt（III） hangman β-octafluoro corroles［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2011， 133（24）： 9178-9180.
61	CHEN F， WANG N， LEI H， et al. Electrocatalytic water oxidation by a water-soluble copper（II） complex with a copper-bound carbonate group acting as a potential proton shuttle［J］. Inorg Chem， 2017， 56（21）： 13368-13375.
62	LIU Y Z， LI X T， SUN Q D， et al. Freestanding 2D NiFe metal-organic framework nanosheets： facilitating proton transfer via organic ligands for efficient oxygen evolution reaction［J］. Small， 2022， 18（26）： 2201076.
63	SU X， GAO M， JIAO L， et al. Electrocatalytic water oxidation by a dinuclear copper complex in a neutral aqueous solution［J］. Angew Chem Int Ed， 2015， 54（16）： 4909-4914.
64	ZHENG H， YE H， XU， T， et al. Electrochemical water oxidation catalyzed by a mononuclear cobalt complex of a pentadentate ligand： the critical effect of the borate anion［J］. New J Chem， 2022， 46 （16）： 7522-7527.
65	SHE S， ZHU Y， CHEN Y， et al. Realizing ultrafast oxygen evolution by introducing proton acceptor into perovskites［J］. Adv Energy Mater， 2019， 9（20）：1900429.
66	WANG Y B， LU Q， GE X L. Molecular-level proton acceptor boosts oxygen evolution catalysis to enable efficient industrial-scale water splitting［J］ Green Energy Environ， 2022， DOI：10.1016/j.gee.2022.07.001.
67	NUTTING J， RAFIEE M， STAHL S. Tetramethylpiperidine N-oxyl （TEMPO）， phthalimide N-oxyl （PINO）， and related N-oxyl species： electrochemical properties and their use in electrocatalytic reactions［J］. Chem Rev， 2018， 118（9）： 4834-4885.
68	RAFIEE M， KAEIMI B， ALIZADEH S. Mechanistic study of the electrocatalytic oxidation of alcohols by TEMPO and NHPI［J］. ChemElectroChem， 2014， 1（2）： 455-462.
69	COMMINGES C， BARHDAI R， DOHERTY A P， et al. Mechanism of 2′6，6′-tetramethylpiperidin-N-oxyl mediated oxidation of alcohols in ionic liquids［J］. J Phys Chem A， 2008， 112（34）： 7848-7855.
70	ZHANG W， XIONG Z， GAO Y， et al. Roles of the base in the electrocatalytic reactions： a case study of glycine electrooxidation［J］. J Electroanal Chem， 2017， 785： 216-219.
71	BADALYAN A， STAHL S. Cooperative electrocatalytic alcohol oxidation with electron-proton-transfer mediators［J］. Nature， 2016， 535： 406-410.
72	LI Y， WEI Y， ZHANG W. Oxidation behavior of N-hydroxyphthalimide （NHPI） and its electrocatalytic ability toward benzyl alcohol： proton acceptor effect［J］. J Electroanal Chem， 2020， 870： 114251.
73	RAFIEE M， WANG F， HRUSZKEWYCZ D， et al. N-Hydroxyphthalimide-mediated electrochemical iodination of methylarenes and comparison to electron-transfer-initiated C—H functionalization［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2018， 140（1）： 22-25.
74	YANG C， FARMER L， PRATT D， et al. Mechanism of electrochemical generation and decomposition of phthalimide-N-oxyl［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2021， 143（27）：10324-10332.

[1]	Wei-Min DU, Xin LIU, Lin ZHU, Jia-Min FU, Wen-Shan GUO, Xiao-Qing YANG, Pei-Shuo SHUANG. Facile Synthesis and High⁃Efficiency Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Performance of Ternary Nickel⁃Based Chalcogenide Nanorod Arrays [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(8): 1252-1261.
[2]	Yan WANG, Shu-Cong ZHANG, Xing-Kun WANG, Zhi-Cheng LIU, Huan-Lei WANG, Ming-Hua HUANG. Research Progress on Transition Metal⁃Based Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction via Seawater Electrolysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(6): 927-940.
[3]	Wei-Jin CAO, Lu BAI, Lan-Lan WU, Jing-De LI, Shu-Yan SONG. Multi⁃Shell Hollow Nickel⁃Cobalt Bimetallic Phosphide Nanospheres for Highly Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(4): 666-672.
[4]	Xue WANG, Yi-Bo WANG, Xian WANG, Jian-Bing ZHU, Jun-Jie GE, Chang-Peng LIU, Wei XING. Research Progress of Mechanism of Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction and Development of Ir⁃based Catalysts [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(4): 616-628.
[5]	Dan WANG, Xian-Biao HOU, Xing-Kun WANG, Zhi-Cheng LIU, Huan-Lei WANG, Ming-Hua HUANG. Research Progress of Carbon‑Encapsulated Iron‑Based Nanoparticles Electrocatalysts for Zinc‑Air Batteries [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(10): 1488-1500.
[6]	MENG Yang, YANG Chan, PENG Juan. Progress in Iron, Cobalt and Nickel-Based Metal Phosphide Nano-catalysts for Hydrogen Production under Alkaline Conditions [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2020, 37(7): 733-745.
[7]	LI Xinjie,XU He,YU Mei,ZHANG Chao,GUO Anru,LIU Chang. Nitrogen-Doped Graphitic Carbon Coated Cobalt Nanocatalysts for Highly Efficient and Durable Hydrogen Evolution Reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2019, 36(5): 571-577.
[8]	LI Xinjie, XU He, YU Mei, ZHANG Chao, GUO Anru, LIU Chang. Nitrogen-Doped Graphitic Carbon Coated Cobalt Nanocatalysts for Highly Efficient and Durable Hydrogen Evolution Reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2019, 36(5): 0-0.
[9]	YU Peng,LI Jinghong. Metal Sulfide(Phosphide) for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2018, 35(9): 1093-1101.
[10]	CHEN Si,SUN Lizhen,SHU Xinxin,ZHANG Jintao. Graphene-based Catalysts for Efficient Electrocatalytic Applications [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2018, 35(3): 272-285.
[11]	YAO Huiying, YANG Tao, HUANG Xing, ZHU Jia, LI Qing, XU Wei, CHI Lifeng. Coordination Complexes Based on MX₄ Structure as Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2018, 35(3): 328-341.
[12]	SONG Hongwei, HUANG Hui, TAN Ning, CHENG Buming, GUO Zhongcheng. Electrochemical Behavior of Al/Pb-0.2%Ag Anode in Fluoride Ion and Sulfuric Acid [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2016, 33(12): 1455-1461.
[13]	MA Nan, GAO Guofeng, HAO Genyan, ZHAO Qiang, LI Jinping. Cobalt Oxygen-evolving Catalysts Generated in Situ and Interfaced with Silicon-based Semiconductors for Solar Water Splitting [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2015, 32(5): 576-582.
[14]	JIANG Wei1,3, WU Yaoming1,2*, CHENG Yong1, WANG Limin1,2. Industrial Application of Nickel-Iron Battery and Its Recent Research Progress [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2014, 31(07): 749-756.
[15]	WANG Lipin, WANG Senlin*, DUAN Qianhua. Ni/NiFe₂O₄ Composite Electrode Prepared by Electro-deposition and Its Electro-catalytic Performance Towards Oxygen Evolution Reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2013, 30(06): 690-697.

Research Progress in the Effects of Proton Acceptor/Donor on Electrocatalytic Reactions

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 74

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments