Please wait a minute...
图/表 详细信息
基于指纹图谱、量值传递及化学计量学的薏苡竹叶散质量评价
王野谌, 邱智东, 张衍旭, 王俪颖, 王茂旭, 董雪莲
应用化学    2024, 41 (3): 422-436.   DOI:10.19894/j.issn.1000-0518.230277
摘要   (59 HTML3 PDF (3235KB)(53)  

建立高效液相指纹图谱进行外部质量控制,结合化学计量学探究内部质量影响因素,通过量值传递规律确定制备工艺稳定性,全面完善薏苡竹叶散(YZP)质量评价系统。利用《中药色谱指纹图谱相似度评价系统》(2012.130723版本)绘制15批YZP指纹图谱并评价相似度; 选择Origin 2019b 64Bit进行聚类分析(CA),利用SIMCA 14.1进行主成分分析(PCA)和正交偏最小二乘判别分析(OPLS-DA),获得导致质量差异的主要成分; 测定15批淡竹叶药材和YZP中荭草苷和异荭草苷的含量,探究样品制备过程中的量值传递规律。结果表明,15批YZP指纹图谱得到21个共有峰,指认了6种成分,分别为9号峰(异荭草苷)、10号峰(荭草苷)、13号峰(牡荆素)、14号峰(异牡荆素)、15号峰(连翘酯苷A)和20号峰(连翘苷),相似度在0.956~0.995之间,符合相关规定; CA结果显示,15批YZP被分为两类,PCA共得到3个主成分,累计贡献率82.4%,OPLS-DA得出10个贡献率较大成分,包括已指认出的9号峰(异荭草苷)、13号峰(牡荆素)和20号峰(连翘苷),有利于进一步质量评价; 15批淡竹叶饮片中荭草苷、异荭草苷的质量分数为0.2156%~0.9923%、0.530%~2.052%,15批YZP中荭草苷、异荭草苷的质量分数为0.022%~0.112%、0.065%~0.312%,饮片-YZP中荭草苷、异荭草苷转移率为78.41%~119.54%、74.57%~127.96%,转移率皆在平均值±30%范围内,未出现离散值,说明制备工艺较稳定。本文建立了HPLC指纹图谱结合多指标含量测定方法,有效控制YZP外部质量,通过化学计量学确定了影响质量的内部因素,转移率稳定确定制备工艺稳定可靠,为YZP全面质量评价奠定基础。

SampleNumber of the peaks
1234567891011
10.0950.0500.1070.0770.1430.1380.0970.0520.0350.0930.029
20.4940.1010.2670.1840.4070.3990.0450.2950.5180.1920.112
30.0800.0330.0940.0750.0930.1740.0210.0250.0220.1270.085
40.1100.0440.0750.0350.0810.1310.2740.0840.0180.0970.032
50.0900.0410.0820.0590.1040.2590.0310.0220.0190.2470.019
60.0790.0320.0280.0780.1060.2480.0240.0230.0190.1470.084
70.4690.1040.0910.1780.4250.6010.0430.2910.5040.2940.122
80.0720.0220.0680.0140.0940.2210.0280.0240.0980.1620.076
90.0890.0360.0590.0380.0820.1030.3920.0230.1060.1060.030
100.0820.0340.0580.0540.0880.2420.0440.0240.1150.2840.029
110.0850.0420.0820.0720.0860.1120.0950.0230.1050.1030.018
120.3670.0970.2060.1660.3760.4600.0340.2550.4070.3620.095
130.0800.0300.0820.0780.0850.2010.0520.0140.0690.1350.069
140.1090.0410.0600.0360.0840.1220.1400.0190.1000.0950.028
150.4760.1010.2270.1860.4210.5710.0400.3000.4970.2900.111
RSD/%91.155.565.866.980.862.2116.9120.6111.549.360.4
SampleNumber of the peaks
12131415161718192021
11.4120.2760.3897.0421.0000.0540.2850.0780.7540.063
21.6440.3960.7778.4901.0000.4620.0780.1250.7452.397
31.2390.2160.3705.6821.0000.0350.1680.0160.7890.079
40.8190.2250.3355.2821.0000.0220.0910.1150.9880.905
51.1850.2720.3306.2831.0000.0410.1940.0610.7270.064
61.2270.2460.3875.6581.0000.0360.1650.0160.8020.074
71.9140.4320.89110.1281.0000.5450.0690.0500.7252.730
81.1960.2550.3965.6241.0000.0350.1680.0350.8020.047
90.7830.2480.3335.0961.0000.0220.1190.0760.9200.040
101.1170.2850.3436.0751.0000.0430.2220.0730.7040.066
111.1760.2500.3235.9121.0000.0440.2030.0620.7120.073
121.4120.3500.6387.2861.0000.3740.0790.0850.7482.107
131.1480.2460.4205.3191.0000.0320.1550.0360.8140.058
140.8270.2510.3505.1281.0000.0220.1080.1100.9850.911
151.7380.4180.8378.8661.0000.4740.0970.1070.6872.629
RSD/%26.224.642.723.6133.342.650.112.2132.0
View table in article
表4 15批YZP共有峰相对峰面积
正文中引用本图/表的段落
将YZP指纹图谱与各对照品色谱图比对,以保留时间是否相近为主要评判标准,同时结合色谱图中其它信息,最终指认出6个成分,分别为9号峰(异荭草苷)、10号峰(荭草苷)、13号峰(牡荆素)、14号峰(异牡荆素)、15号峰(连翘酯苷A)和20号峰(连翘苷)。由于16号峰分离度良好且峰面积适宜,因此选择16号色谱峰为参照峰,计算出各共有峰的相对峰面积值,结果RSD值在12.2%~133.3%之间,反映不同批次YZP中各成分含量相差较大,质量有明显区别,具体结果见表4。
本文的其它图/表