Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 1532-1538.DOI: 10.19894/j.issn.1000-0518.250266
• Full Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2025-07-02
Accepted:2025-09-16
Published:2025-11-01
Online:2025-12-05
Contact:
Jing JI
About author:1946784311@qq.comCLC Number:
Jing JI, Yan ZHAO. Application of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen and Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in the Diagnosis of Cervical Precancerous Lesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2025, 42(11): 1532-1538.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://yyhx.ciac.jl.cn/EN/10.19894/j.issn.1000-0518.250266
| Group | Number of cases | ρ(SCC-Ag)/(ng·mL-1) | Median ρ(SCC-Ag)/(ng·mL-1) | Positive rate [n(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical squamous cell carcinoma group | 197 | 12.18±23.70 | 3.54 (0.5~156.2) | 113 (57.3) |
| Cervical other carcinoma group | 75 | 3.44±10.77 | 1.21 (0.45~91.1) | 18 (24) |
| Cervical precancerous lesion group | 134 | 1.25±1.19 | 0.96 (0.42~12.22) | 7 (5.2) |
| Healthy control group | 201 | 1.07±0.41 | 0.99 (0.5~2.55) | 0 (0) |
Table 1 Comparison of serum SCC-Ag concentrations between three study groups and a healthy control group
| Group | Number of cases | ρ(SCC-Ag)/(ng·mL-1) | Median ρ(SCC-Ag)/(ng·mL-1) | Positive rate [n(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical squamous cell carcinoma group | 197 | 12.18±23.70 | 3.54 (0.5~156.2) | 113 (57.3) |
| Cervical other carcinoma group | 75 | 3.44±10.77 | 1.21 (0.45~91.1) | 18 (24) |
| Cervical precancerous lesion group | 134 | 1.25±1.19 | 0.96 (0.42~12.22) | 7 (5.2) |
| Healthy control group | 201 | 1.07±0.41 | 0.99 (0.5~2.55) | 0 (0) |
| Group | Number of cases | Pre-treatment SCC-Ag/(ng·mL-1) | Pre-treatment positive rate [n(%)] | Post-treatment SCC-Ag/(ng·mL-1) | Post-treatment positive rate [n(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical cancer surgery group | |||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma subgroup | 90 | 8.64±18.30 | 44 (48.9) | 1.33±2.72 | 2 (2.2) |
| Other carcinoma subgroup | 37 | 4.98±15.14 | 9 (24.3) | 0.96±0.53 | 1 (2.7) |
| Cervical cancer chemotherapy group | |||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma subgroup | 64 | 17.85±31.42 | 47 (73.4) | 4.15±10.60 | 12 (18.8) |
| Other carcinoma subgroup | 22 | 2.24±2.57 | 6 (27.2) | 1.12±0.73 | 2 (9.1) |
| Cervical precancerous lesion group | 35 | 1.60±2.07 | 4 (0.11) | 1.17±0.53 | 2 (0.05) |
Table 2 Serum SCC-Ag levels and positivity rates before and after treatment in different groups of study subjects
| Group | Number of cases | Pre-treatment SCC-Ag/(ng·mL-1) | Pre-treatment positive rate [n(%)] | Post-treatment SCC-Ag/(ng·mL-1) | Post-treatment positive rate [n(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical cancer surgery group | |||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma subgroup | 90 | 8.64±18.30 | 44 (48.9) | 1.33±2.72 | 2 (2.2) |
| Other carcinoma subgroup | 37 | 4.98±15.14 | 9 (24.3) | 0.96±0.53 | 1 (2.7) |
| Cervical cancer chemotherapy group | |||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma subgroup | 64 | 17.85±31.42 | 47 (73.4) | 4.15±10.60 | 12 (18.8) |
| Other carcinoma subgroup | 22 | 2.24±2.57 | 6 (27.2) | 1.12±0.73 | 2 (9.1) |
| Cervical precancerous lesion group | 35 | 1.60±2.07 | 4 (0.11) | 1.17±0.53 | 2 (0.05) |
| Group Sd | Number of cases | HPV detection | SCC-Ag detection | Combined SCC-Ag and HPV detection | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Low-to-medium risk type | High-risk type | ||||
| Cervical cancer group | ||||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma subgroup | 103 | 5(4.8) | 2(2.0) | 96(93.2) | 52(50.5) | 98(95.1) |
| Other carcinoma subgroup | 37 | 9(24) | 0(0) | 28(76) | 7(18.9) | 30(81.1) |
| Total | 140 | 14(10) | 2(1.4) | 124(88.6) | 59(42.1) | 128(91.4) |
| Cervical precancerous lesion group | ||||||
| Low-grade (Grade Ⅰ) Subgroup | 33 | 1(3.0) | 4(12.1) | 28(84.9) | 0(0) | 32(96.9) |
| High-grade (Grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ) Subgroup | 134 | 4(3.0) | 4(3.0) | 125(96.0) | 7(5.2) | 130(97.0) |
| Total | 167 | 5(3.0) | 8(4.8) | 153(91.6) | 7(4.2) | 162(97.1) |
Table 3 Comparison of HPV detection rate and pre-treatment SCC-Ag positivity rate between cervical cancer group and precancerous lesion group [n(%)]
| Group Sd | Number of cases | HPV detection | SCC-Ag detection | Combined SCC-Ag and HPV detection | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Low-to-medium risk type | High-risk type | ||||
| Cervical cancer group | ||||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma subgroup | 103 | 5(4.8) | 2(2.0) | 96(93.2) | 52(50.5) | 98(95.1) |
| Other carcinoma subgroup | 37 | 9(24) | 0(0) | 28(76) | 7(18.9) | 30(81.1) |
| Total | 140 | 14(10) | 2(1.4) | 124(88.6) | 59(42.1) | 128(91.4) |
| Cervical precancerous lesion group | ||||||
| Low-grade (Grade Ⅰ) Subgroup | 33 | 1(3.0) | 4(12.1) | 28(84.9) | 0(0) | 32(96.9) |
| High-grade (Grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ) Subgroup | 134 | 4(3.0) | 4(3.0) | 125(96.0) | 7(5.2) | 130(97.0) |
| Total | 167 | 5(3.0) | 8(4.8) | 153(91.6) | 7(4.2) | 162(97.1) |
| Clinicopathological characteristic | Total number of cases | Pre-treatment SCC-Ag positive | X2 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases | Percentage/% | ||||
| Age (years) | |||||
| <45 | 27 | 9 | 33.3 | 3.170 | 0.075 |
| ≥45 | 79 | 42 | 53.2 | ||
| FIGO stage | |||||
| Stage IA | 4 | 1 | 25 | 20.311 | 0.000 |
| Stage IB | 48 | 15 | 31.3 | ||
| Stage IIA | 22 | 10 | 45.5 | ||
| Stage IIB | 2 | 1 | 50 | ||
| Stage IIIC | 29 | 24 | 82.7 | ||
| Differentiation degree | |||||
| Well-differentiated | 2 | 1 | 50 | 0.562 | 0.755 |
| Moderately differentiated | 65 | 32 | 49.2 | ||
| Poorly differentiated | 39 | 17 | 42.5 | ||
| Lymphovascular embolism | |||||
| Positive | 64 | 31 | 48.4 | 0.104 | 0.747 |
| Negative | 42 | 19 | 45.2 | ||
| Pelvic lymph node metastasis | |||||
| Positive | 26 | 21 | 80.8 | 14.716 | 0.000 |
| Negative | 80 | 30 | 37.5 | ||
| Para-aortic lymph node metastasis | |||||
| Positive | 12 | 12 | 100 | 15.156 | 0.000 |
| Negative | 94 | 38 | 40.4 | ||
| Infiltration depth | |||||
| Full thickness of cervix involved | 25 | 19 | 76 | 12.927 | 0.002 |
| 1/3 Thickness of cervix involved | 67 | 28 | 41.8 | ||
| Gland involvement | 14 | 1 | 7.1 | ||
Table 4 Relationship between different clinical characteristics and pre-treatment serum SCC-Ag positive rate in cervical phosphorus cancer patients
| Clinicopathological characteristic | Total number of cases | Pre-treatment SCC-Ag positive | X2 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases | Percentage/% | ||||
| Age (years) | |||||
| <45 | 27 | 9 | 33.3 | 3.170 | 0.075 |
| ≥45 | 79 | 42 | 53.2 | ||
| FIGO stage | |||||
| Stage IA | 4 | 1 | 25 | 20.311 | 0.000 |
| Stage IB | 48 | 15 | 31.3 | ||
| Stage IIA | 22 | 10 | 45.5 | ||
| Stage IIB | 2 | 1 | 50 | ||
| Stage IIIC | 29 | 24 | 82.7 | ||
| Differentiation degree | |||||
| Well-differentiated | 2 | 1 | 50 | 0.562 | 0.755 |
| Moderately differentiated | 65 | 32 | 49.2 | ||
| Poorly differentiated | 39 | 17 | 42.5 | ||
| Lymphovascular embolism | |||||
| Positive | 64 | 31 | 48.4 | 0.104 | 0.747 |
| Negative | 42 | 19 | 45.2 | ||
| Pelvic lymph node metastasis | |||||
| Positive | 26 | 21 | 80.8 | 14.716 | 0.000 |
| Negative | 80 | 30 | 37.5 | ||
| Para-aortic lymph node metastasis | |||||
| Positive | 12 | 12 | 100 | 15.156 | 0.000 |
| Negative | 94 | 38 | 40.4 | ||
| Infiltration depth | |||||
| Full thickness of cervix involved | 25 | 19 | 76 | 12.927 | 0.002 |
| 1/3 Thickness of cervix involved | 67 | 28 | 41.8 | ||
| Gland involvement | 14 | 1 | 7.1 | ||
| Clinicopathological characteristic | β | Standard error | Wald | OR | 95%CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.418 | 0.572 | 0.533 | 0.659 | 0.215~2.0211 | 0.465 |
| FIGO stage | 0.898 | 0.579 | 2.404 | 2.455 | 0.789~7.637 | 0.121 |
| Pelvic lymph node metastasis | 1.964 | 0.424 | 21.426 | 7.130 | 3.104~16.380 | 0.000 |
| Para-aortic lymph node metastasis | 1.881 | 0.675 | 7.761 | 6.560 | 1.747~24.638 | 0.005 |
| Infiltration depth | 4.147 | 1.102 | 14.168 | 63.250 | 7.298~548.154 | 0.000 |
Table 5 Logstic multivariate analysis of factors influencing serum SCC-Ag in cervical cancer patients before treatment
| Clinicopathological characteristic | β | Standard error | Wald | OR | 95%CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.418 | 0.572 | 0.533 | 0.659 | 0.215~2.0211 | 0.465 |
| FIGO stage | 0.898 | 0.579 | 2.404 | 2.455 | 0.789~7.637 | 0.121 |
| Pelvic lymph node metastasis | 1.964 | 0.424 | 21.426 | 7.130 | 3.104~16.380 | 0.000 |
| Para-aortic lymph node metastasis | 1.881 | 0.675 | 7.761 | 6.560 | 1.747~24.638 | 0.005 |
| Infiltration depth | 4.147 | 1.102 | 14.168 | 63.250 | 7.298~548.154 | 0.000 |
| [1] | JIANG W, LIU S, FU L. HDAC6 as a therapeutic target for HPV E7-driven cervical cancer[J]. Genome Instab Dis, 2025, 6(2): 117-128. |
| [2] | 廖波儿, 郭伟, 木合布力·阿布力孜. 甲氧基查尔酮类化合物的合成,体外抗宫颈癌活性及其与MDM2分子对接研究[J]. 合成化学, 2025, 33(1): 30-36. |
| LIAO B E, GUO W, MUHEBULI A. Synthesis, anti-cervical cancer activity, and MDM2 molecular docking of methoxychalcone derivatives[J]. Chin J Synth Chem, 2025, 33(1): 30-36. | |
| [3] | CONG C, LIU R, SUN Y, et al. A biosensor based on tetrahydroxyborate-bismuth vanadate for early diagnosis towards lncRNA markers in cervical cancer tumors[J]. Talanta, 2025, 294(11): 128218. |
| [4] | JIN J, FANG X, CHEN A, et al. Ultrasensitive MXene-based electrochemical biosensor for squamous cell carcinoma antigen detection[J]. Chem Pap, 2025, 79(4): 2225-2233. |
| [5] | KAMANI T, PATEL S K, ANUSHKANNAN N K, et al. Design and development of surface plasmon resonance biosensor for early detection of cervical cancer utilizing nucleus and cytoplasm[J]. Plasmonics, 2025, 20(4): 2093. |
| [6] | 王艳艳, 杨柳, 韩浩健, 等. 基于AS1411核酸适配体和金纳米颗粒组装新型生物传感器及其在超灵敏检测肿瘤细胞中的应用[J]. 分析科学学报, 2025, 41(1): 21-27. |
| WANG Y Y, YANG L, HAN H J, et al. AS1411 aptamer and gold nanoparticle-based biosensor for ultrasensitive tumor cell detection[J]. J Anal Sci, 2025, 41(1): 21-27. | |
| [7] | ZUO J, HUANG Y, AN J, et al. Nomograms based on HPV load for predicting survival in cervical squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2019, 31(2): 389-399. |
| [8] | 冯雨舒, 陈诗敏, 王美玉, 等. 山西省农村女性高危型人乳头瘤病毒DNA和中和抗体阳性率及其与宫颈上皮内瘤变的关联分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2025, 46(5): 803-809. |
| FENG Y S, CHEN S M, WANG M Y, et al. Prevalence of high-risk HPV DNA and neutralizing antibodies in rural women and their association with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Shanxi[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2025, 46(5): 803-809. | |
| [9] | IBRAGIMOVA M, TSYGANOV M, SHPILEVA O, et al. HPV status and its genomic integration affect survival of patients with cervical cancer[J]. Neoplasma, 2018, 65(3): 441-448. |
| [10] | TSIKOURAS P, ZERVOUDIS S, MANAV B, et al. Cervical cancer: screening, diagnosis and staging[J]. J Buon, 2016, 21(2): 320-325. |
| [11] | 奚晓丽, 田天佳, 郭卫东. 晚期非小细胞肺癌患者重组人血管内皮抑制素联合化疗临床观察[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2020, 27(17): 1399-1403. |
| XI X L, TIAN T J, GUO W D. Clinical observation of recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat, 2020, 27(17): 1399-1403. | |
| [12] | ACHARYA PANDEY R, KARMACHARYA E. Cervical cancer screening behavior among women in Nepal[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2017, 22(1): 32. |
| [13] | RYU H K, BAEK J S, KANG W D, et al. Prognostic value of SCC-Ag for tumor recurrence in cervical cancer[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2015, 58(5): 368-376. |
| [14] | 郭睿, 邓春霞, 张凡. HPV L1壳蛋白联合高危HPV分型,CA125,SCC-Ag在宫颈癌诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2024, 25(1): 12-15. |
| GUO R, DENG C X, ZHANG F. Clinical value of HPV L1 capsid protein combined with high-risk HPV genotyping, CA125, and SCC-Ag in cervical cancer diagnosis[J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Clin, 2024, 25(1): 12-15. | |
| [15] | 韩茜茜, 卜岛. CT检查联合血清肿瘤标志物对宫颈癌患者腹膜后淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(6): 982-987. |
| HAN X X, BU D. Diagnostic value of CT combined with serum tumor markers for retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer[J]. Imaging Sci Photochem, 2020, 38(6): 982-987. | |
| [16] | XIONG Y, PENG X P, LIANG L Z, et al. Clinical significance of combined CYFRA21-1 and SCC-Ag in cervical cancer[J]. Chin J Cancer, 2009, 28(1): 64-67. |
| [1] | Hui-Yao FANG, Yuan LIN, Zhao-Hui SU. Application of Atomic Force Microscopy-Infrared for Single Micro- and Nanoplastics [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2025, 42(8): 1070-1077. |
| [2] | Hou-Guang LIU, Zheng LI, Shan-Shan HUO, Qiong-Ling WEI, Hai-Mei ZHANG, Jian-Bin WU, Ya-Wen JIANG. Proteomic Alterations in Xenograft of Human Melanoma by Targeting Knockout of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2025, 42(3): 345-352. |
| [3] | Xuan HU, Tong-Chuan WU, Xin-Dan AI, Xing-Yue HE, Hong-Kang XU, Fei ZHENG, Hao YUE, Yu-Lin DAI. The Anti-Cervical Cancer Mechanism of Shaofu Zhuyu Decoction Based on Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Combined with Network Pharmacology [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2024, 41(5): 687-702. |
| [4] | Xin XU, Ye LI, Min WANG, Zhang-Cheng FU, Guo-Min QI, Chun-Hua LU. Self‑Assembled MicroRNA‑21 Responsive Zn2+/DNA Nanoparticles for Tumor Fluorescence Imaging and Oxidative Stress Therapy [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2024, 41(1): 164-174. |
| [5] | Li-Zhen YUAN, Ni-Ya LIN, Yun-Fan ZHANG, Jing-Jing HU, Xiao-Ding LOU, Fan XIA. Development in Probes on Outer Surface of Nanochannels for Detecting Biomarkers [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2024, 41(1): 87-99. |
| [6] | Jing-Xia GAO, Zi-An WANG, Lian-Ming ZHANG, Jian-Ping LI. Research Progress of Macrocyclic Compounds in Highly Selective Molecular Imprinting Recognition System [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2023, 40(1): 24-39. |
| [7] | Lin-Jie GUO, Hong-Zhen PENG, Jiang LI, Li-Hua WANG, Ying ZHU. Advances in Receptor‑ligand Interactions on Cell Surface Based on Framework Nucleic Acids [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(10): 1475-1487. |
| [8] | ZHENG Jie, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-Peng, CUI Jian-Guo. Research Progress of Droplet Generation and Detection Technology of Microfluidic Chip [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2021, 38(1): 1-10. |
| [9] | LI Yan1, LIU Xiaoyan2,4, ZHANG Shun2,4, LIU Ting3,4, LI Yongjun2,4, LAN Yanyu2,4, WANG Aimin2,4, WANG Yonglin3,4, HE Bin3,4*. Synthesis and Application of a Coumarin Fluorescently Labeled Peptide [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2014, 31(12): 1413-1418. |
| [10] | DOU Yun-Qin, GAO Yan, YU Shu-Jie, LI Xiao-Li, SONG Hui-Mei, ZHANG Li-Chao, CAO Guo-Yang, GU Xiao-Qiang, LI Tie-Chun, HONG Zi-Ming, ZHANG Han-Qi. Identify of the sulfur compounds in industrial mixed alkanes [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2009, 26(08): 993-995. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
