Research Progress of Noble Metal Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Environment

doi:10.19894/j.issn.1000-0518.230129

Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 1126-1139.DOI: 10.19894/j.issn.1000-0518.230129

• Review • Previous Articles Next Articles

Research Progress of Noble Metal Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Environment

Yin-Nan QIAN, Chuan SHI, Wei ZHANG, Zhao-Yan LUO()

School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering，Shenzhen University，Shenzhen 518000，China

Received:2023-05-04 Accepted:2023-07-08 Published:2023-08-01 Online:2023-08-24
Contact: Zhao-Yan LUO
About author:luozhaoyan@szu.edu.cn
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(22109100)

Abstract

Abstract:

Water electrolysis is one of the most efficient and environmentally benign methods for the hydrogen production using renewable but intermittent power sources. Proton exchange membrane （PEM） water electrolyzers hold great significance for renewable energy storage and conversion. The acidic oxygen evolution reaction （OER） is one of the main roadblocks that hinder the practical application of PEM water electrolyzers. Highly active， cost-effective， and durable electrocatalysts are indispensable for lowering the high kinetic barrier of OER to achieve boosted reaction kinetics. To date， a wide spectrum of advanced electrocatalysts has been designed and synthesized for enhanced acidic OER performance， though Ir and Ru based nanostructures still represent the state-of-the-art catalysts. In this Progress Report， recent research progress on novel electrocatalysts with acidic OER performance is reviewed. First， the basic understanding of acidic OER， including the reaction mechanism， is discussed. On this basis， the design and synthesis progress of noble metal acidic OER electrocatalysts are reviewed for noble metal Ir， Ru single atoms， alloys， oxides， etc. Finally， the future development of acidic OER is prospected from the aspects of reaction mechanism research and more efficient electrocatalyst design.

Key words: Acidic oxygen evolution reaction, Iridium-based catalysts, Ruthenium-based catalysts

CLC Number:

O611

Yin-Nan QIAN, Chuan SHI, Wei ZHANG, Zhao-Yan LUO. Research Progress of Noble Metal Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2023, 40(8): 1126-1139.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig.1 Six classical OER mechanistic pathways［23-25］

（Ⅰ） Krasil'shchikov （1963）	（Ⅱ） O'Grady et al. （1974）
1） $? M + O H - ? → ? ? M O H + e -$ 2） $? M O H + O H - ? → ? ? M O - + H 2 O$ 3） $? M O - ? → ? ? M O + e -$ 4） $? 2 M O ? → ? ? 2 M + O 2$	1） $? M z + O H - ? → ? ? M z O H + e -$ 2） $? M z O H ? → ? ? M Z + 1 O H + e -$ 3） $??? 2 M Z + 1 O H + 2 O H - ? → ? ? 2 M Z + 2 H 2 O + O 2 + e -$
（Ⅲ） Bockris Oxide Path （1983）	（Ⅳ） Bockris Electro Oxide Path （1983）
1） $M + O H - ? → ? ? M O H + e -$ 2） $2 M O H ? → ? ? M O + M + H 2 O$ 3） $2 M O ? → ? ? 2 M + O 2$	1） $? M + O H - ? → ? ? M O H + e -$ 2） $? M O H + O H - ? → ? ? M O + H 2 O + e -$ 3） $? 2 M O ? → ? ? 2 M + O 2$
（Ⅴ） The Metal Peroxide Path	（Ⅵ） DFT-predicted Path
1） $M + H 2 O ? → ? ? M O H + H + + e -$ 2） $2 M O H ? → ? ? M O + H 2 O + M$ 3） $M O + H 2 O ? → ? ? M O O H + H + + e -$ 4） $2 M O O H ? → ? ? 2 M O + H 2 O + O 2 + M$	1） $M + H 2 O ? → ? ? M O H + H + + e -$ 2） $M O H ? → ? ? M O + H + + e -$ 3） $M O + H 2 O ? → ? ? M O O H + H + + e -$ 4） $M O O H ? → ? ? M + O 2 + H + + e -$

Fig.1 Six classical OER mechanistic pathways［23-25］

（Ⅰ） Krasil'shchikov （1963）	（Ⅱ） O'Grady et al. （1974）
1） $? M + O H - ? → ? ? M O H + e -$ 2） $? M O H + O H - ? → ? ? M O - + H 2 O$ 3） $? M O - ? → ? ? M O + e -$ 4） $? 2 M O ? → ? ? 2 M + O 2$	1） $? M z + O H - ? → ? ? M z O H + e -$ 2） $? M z O H ? → ? ? M Z + 1 O H + e -$ 3） $??? 2 M Z + 1 O H + 2 O H - ? → ? ? 2 M Z + 2 H 2 O + O 2 + e -$
（Ⅲ） Bockris Oxide Path （1983）	（Ⅳ） Bockris Electro Oxide Path （1983）
1） $M + O H - ? → ? ? M O H + e -$ 2） $2 M O H ? → ? ? M O + M + H 2 O$ 3） $2 M O ? → ? ? 2 M + O 2$	1） $? M + O H - ? → ? ? M O H + e -$ 2） $? M O H + O H - ? → ? ? M O + H 2 O + e -$ 3） $? 2 M O ? → ? ? 2 M + O 2$
（Ⅴ） The Metal Peroxide Path	（Ⅵ） DFT-predicted Path
1） $M + H 2 O ? → ? ? M O H + H + + e -$ 2） $2 M O H ? → ? ? M O + H 2 O + M$ 3） $M O + H 2 O ? → ? ? M O O H + H + + e -$ 4） $2 M O O H ? → ? ? 2 M O + H 2 O + O 2 + M$	1） $M + H 2 O ? → ? ? M O H + H + + e -$ 2） $M O H ? → ? ? M O + H + + e -$ 3） $M O + H 2 O ? → ? ? M O O H + H + + e -$ 4） $M O O H ? → ? ? M + O 2 + H + + e -$

Fig.2 Adsorbates evolution mechanism （AEM）（a） and lattice-oxygen participation mechanism （LOM）（b） for OER in the acidic environment［29］

Fig.3 Electrocatalytic OER properties of IrO2， Co3O4 and Ir-Co3O4 catalysts［65］

Fig.4 EDS mapping of Ir-Co3O4 nanoparticles［65］

Fig.5 OER stability of Ru1-Pt3Cu determined via chronopotentiometry［45］

Table 1 Summary of representative noble metal based OER electrocatalysts and their catalytic performances

Catalyst	Electrolyte	Mechanism	Overpotential/mV （at 10 mA/cm²）	Stability	Tafel slope
Ir NPs^［56］	0.5 mol/L HClO₄	NA	278	NA	56
Ir （PEO-b-PS）^［57］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	240	NA	49
3D Ir superstructures^［58］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	270	NA	50
Ir/GF^［64］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	290	NA	NA
Ir Co₃O₄^［65］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	225	Continuous operation 130 h	64.1
2D Ru nanosheet^［68］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	260	Reasonable stability	NA
IrO₂^［88］	0.1 mol/L HClO₄	LOM	382	Deactivation after 0.5 h	43.9
RuO₂^［88］	0.1 mol/L HClO₄	LOM	310	100% dissolution after 2 h	38
IrO₂@RuO₂^［88］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	LOM	270	1 000 cycles at 0.3~1.2 V	57.8
Ru₁-Pt₃Cu^［45］	0.1 mol/L HClO₄	NA	220	NA	NA
Ir-Pd nanowires^［71］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	300	5.56 h at10 mA/cm²	60
Ir-Ni lumps connected^［73］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	NA	8 h at 1 mA/cm²	NA
Ir-Ni_0.57Fe_0.82^［75］	0.5 mol/L HClO₄	NA	284	5.6 h at 10 mA/cm²	48.6
Co-doped IrCu^［76］	0.1 mol/L HClO₄	NA	293	2 000 cyclesat 1.2 V	50
Ir_0.5W_0.5 nanobranches^［77］	0.5 mol/L HClO₄	NA	250	NA	56.6
IrCoNi PHNCs^［78］	0.1 mol/L HClO₄	NA	303	0.56 h at 15 mA/cm²	53.8
IrNiCu DNF^［79］	0.1 mol/L HClO₄	NA	NA	2 500 cycles at 1.0~1.7 V	48
AlNiCoIrMo^［80］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	233	7 000 cycles at 1.20~1.48 V	55.2
IrNiCu alloy^［81］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	262	NA	71.4
RuCu nanosheets^［84］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	236	12 h at 10 mA/cm²	40.4
RuCu nanoalloy^［86］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	270	NA	75.8
Ir_0.7Ru_0.3O₂^［87］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	NA	250	NA	60.4
Co-doped RuO₂^［88］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	LOM	169	Stable at 10 mA/cm² for 50 h	66.9
IrO _x /SrIrO₃^［90］	0.5 mol/L H₂SO₄	AEM	270~290	30 h at 10 mA/cm²	NA
Y₂Ir₂O₇^［92］	0.1 mol/L HClO₄	NA	NA	NA	51.8

References 93

1	ALIA S M， SHULDA S， NGO C， et al. Iridium-based nanowires as highly active， oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts［J］. ACS Catal， 2018， 8（3）： 2111-2120.
2	ANTOLINI E. Iridium as catalyst and cocatalyst for oxygen evolution/reduction in acidic polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzers and fuel cells［J］. ACS Catal， 2014， 4（5）： 1426-1440.
3	CHANG X， WANG T， YANG P， et al. The development of cocatalysts for photoelectrochemical CO₂reduction［J］. Adv Mater， 2019， 31（31）： 1804710.
4	JIAO Y， ZHENG Y， JARONIEC M， et al. Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen-and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions［J］. Chem Soc Rev， 2015， 44（8）： 2060-2086.
5	JIN H， JOO J， CHAUDHARI N K， et al. Recent progress in bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting under acidic conditions［J］. ChemElectroChem， 2019， 6（13）： 3244-3253.
6	PARK S， SHAO Y， LIU J， et al. Oxygen electrocatalysts for water electrolyzers and reversible fuel cells： status and perspective［J］. Energy Environ Sci， 2012， 5（11）： 9331-9344.
7	SHAN J， LING T， DAVEY K， et al. Transition-metal-doped RuIr bifunctional nanocrystals for overall water splitting in acidic environments［J］. Adv Mater， 2019， 31（17）： 1900510.
8	SARDAR K， PETRUCCO E， HILEY C I， et al. Water-splitting electrocatalysis in acid conditions using ruthenate-iridate pyrochlores［J］. Angew Chem Int Ed， 2014， 53（41）： 10960-10964.
9	FIRMIANO E G S， CORDEIRO M A L， RABELO A C， et al. Graphene oxide as a highly selective substrate to synthesize a layered MoS₂ hybrid electrocatalyst［J］. Chem Commun， 2012， 48（62）： 7687-7689.
10	GHADGE S D， VELIKOKHATNYI O I， DATTA M K， et al. Experimental and theoretical validation of high efficiency and robust electrocatalytic response of one-dimensional （1D）（Mn，Ir）O₂：10F nanorods for the oxygen evolution reaction in PEM-based water electrolysis［J］. ACS Catal， 2019， 9（3）： 2134-2157.
11	ANDRONESCU C， BARWE S， VENTOSA E， et al. Powder catalyst fixation for post-electrolysis structural characterization of NiFe layered double hydroxide based oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts［J］. Angew Chem Int Ed， 2017， 56（37）： 11258-11262.
12	SHIVA KUMAR S， RAMAKRISHNA S U B， BHAGAWAN D， et al. Preparation of RuxPd_1- xO₂ electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction （OER） in PEM water electrolysis［J］. Ionics， 2018， 24（8）： 2411-2419.
13	ZHANG C， WANG B， SHEN X， et al. A nitrogen-doped ordered mesoporous carbon/graphene framework as bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions［J］. Nano Energy， 2016， 30： 503-510.
14	TAHIR M， PAN L， IDREES F， et al. Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction for energy conversion and storage： a comprehensive review［J］. Nano Energy， 2017， 37： 136-157.
15	BUSCH M， HALCK N B， KRAMM U I， et al. Beyond the top of the volcano？–a unified approach to electrocatalytic oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution［J］. Nano Energy， 2016， 29： 126-135.
16	LIU Y， WANG Q， ZHANG J， et al. Recent advances in carbon-supported noble-metal electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction： syntheses， structures， and properties［J］. Adv Energy Mater， 2022， 12（28）： 2200928
17	CHEREVKO S， ZERADJANIN A R， TOPALOV A A， et al. Dissolution of noble metals during oxygen evolution in acidic media［J］. ChemCatChem， 2014， 6（8）： 2219-2223.
18	ZHU J Y， XUE Q， XUE Y Y， et al. Iridium nanotubes as bifunctional electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution and nitrate reduction reactions［J］. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces， 2020， 12（12）： 14064-14070.
19	CARMO M， FRITZ D L， MERGEL J， et al. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis［J］. Int J Hydrogen Energy， 2013， 38（12）： 4901-4934.
20	DA SILVA G C， FERNANDES M R， TICIANELLI E A. Activity and stability of Pt/IrO₂ bifunctional materials as catalysts for the oxygen evolution/reduction reactions［J］. ACS Catal， 2018， 8（3）： 2081-2092.
21	CHEN Y X， LAVACCHI A， MILLER H A， et al. Nanotechnology makes biomass electrolysis more energy efficient than water electrolysis［J］. Nat Commun， 2014， 5（1）： 4036.
22	CHEN Z， DUAN X， WEI W， et al. Electrocatalysts for acidic oxygen evolution reaction： achievements and perspectives［J］. Nano Energy， 2020， 78： 105392.
23	GIMÉNEZ S， BISQUERT J. Photoelectrochemical solar fuel production［M］Cham， Switzerland： Springer， 2016.
24	BOCKRIS J O M. Kinetics of activation controlled consecutive electrochemical reactions： anodic evolution of oxygen［J］. J Chem Phys， 1956， 24（4）： 817-827.
25	ROSSMEISL J， QU Z W， ZHU H， et al. Electrolysis of water on oxide surfaces［J］. J Electroanal Chem， 2007， 607（1）： 83-89.
26	REIER T， NONG H N， TESCHNER D， et al. Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction in acidic environments-reaction mechanisms and catalysts［J］. Adv Energy Mater， 2017， 7（1）： 1601275.
27	SPöRI C， KWAN J T H， BONAKDARPOUR A， et al. The stability challenges of oxygen evolving catalysts： towards a common fundamental understanding and mitigation of catalyst degradation［J］. Angew Chem Int Ed， 2017， 56（22）： 5994-6021.
28	ZHANG J， YANG H B， ZHOU D， et al. Adsorption energy in oxygen electrocatalysis［J］. Chem Rev， 2022， 122（23）： 17028-17072.
29	SHAN J， ZHENG Y， SHI B， et al. Regulating electrocatalysts via surface and interface engineering for acidic water electrooxidation［J］. ACS Energy Lett， 2019， 4（11）： 2719.
30	LIN Y， DONG Y， WANG X， et al. Electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in acidic media［J］. Adv Mater，2023， 35（22）： 2210565.
31	SUEN N T， HUNG S F， QUAN Q， et al. Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction： recent development and future perspectives［J］. Chem Soc Rev， 2017， 46（2）： 337-365.
32	MAN I C， SU H Y， CALLE-VALLEJO F， et al. Universality in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis on oxide surfaces［J］. ChemCatChem， 2011， 3（7）： 1159-1165.
33	ROSSMEISL J， LOGADOTTIR A， NØRSKOV J K. Electrolysis of water on （oxidized） metal surfaces［J］. Chem Phys， 2005， 319（1）： 178-184.
34	LÓPEZ I， ERTEM M Z， MAJI S， et al. A self-improved water-oxidation catalyst： is one site really enough？［J］. Angew Chem Int Ed， 2014， 53（1）： 205-209.
35	CRABTREE R H. Resolving heterogeneity problems and impurity artifacts in operationally homogeneous transition metal catalysts［J］. Chem Rev， 2012， 112（3）： 1536-1554.
36	LEWIS L N. Chemical catalysis by colloids and clusters［J］. Chem Rev， 1993， 93（8）： 2693-2730.
37	KOPER M T M. Analysis of electrocatalytic reaction schemes： distinction between rate-determining and potential-determining steps［J］. J Solid State Electrochem， 2013， 17（2）： 339-344.
38	EXNER K S， OVER H. Kinetics of electrocatalytic reactions from first-principles： a critical comparison with the ab initio thermodynamics approach［J］. Acc Chem Res， 2017， 50（5）： 1240-1247.
39	KELLY S R， KIRK C， CHAN K， et al. Electric field effects in oxygen reduction kinetics： rationalizing pH dependence at the Pt（111）， Au（111）， and Au（100） electrodes［J］. J Phys Chem C， 2020， 124（27）： 14581-14591.
40	RONG X， PAROLIN J， KOLPAK A M. A fundamental relationship between reaction mechanism and stability in metal oxide catalysts for oxygen evolution［J］. ACS Catal， 2016， 6（2）： 1153-1158.
41	YOO J S， RONG X， LIU Y， et al. Role of lattice oxygen participation in understanding trends in the oxygen evolution reaction on perovskites［J］. ACS Catal， 2018， 8（5）： 4628-4636.
42	HIBBERT D B， CHURCHILL C R. Kinetics of the electrochemical evolution of isotopically enriched gases. Part 2.—¹⁸O¹⁶O evolution on NiCo₂O₄ and LiCo_3- xO₄ in alkaline solution［J］. J Chem Soc， Faraday Transact 1： Phys Chem Condensed Phases， 1984， 80（7）： 1965-1975.
43	WOHLFAHRT-MEHRENS M， HEITBAUM J. Oxygen evolution on Ru and RuO₂ electrodes studied using isotope labelling and on-line mass spectrometry［J］. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem， 1987， 237（2）： 251-260.
44	AN L， WEI C， LU M， et al. Recent development of oxygen evolution electrocatalysts in acidic environment ［J］. Adv Mater， 2021， 33（20）： 2006328.
45	YAO Y， HU S， CHEN W， et al. Engineering the electronic structure of single atom Ru sites via compressive strain boosts acidic water oxidation electrocatalysis［J］. Nat Catal， 2019， 2（4）： 304-313.
46	GIORDANO L， HAN B， RISCH M， et al. pH dependence of OER activity of oxides： current and future perspectives［J］. Catal Today， 2016， 262： 2-10.
47	HODNIK N， JOVANOVIČ P， PAVLIŠIČ A， et al. New insights into corrosion of ruthenium and ruthenium oxide nanoparticles in acidic media［J］. J Phys Chem C， 2015， 119（18）： 10140-10147.
48	REIER T， OEZASLAN M， STRASSER P. Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction （OER） on Ru， Ir， and Pt catalysts： a comparative study of nanoparticles and bulk materials［J］. ACS Catal， 2012， 2（8）： 1765-1772.
49	DAMJANOVIC A， DEY A， BOCKRIS J O M. Electrode kinetics of oxygen evolution and dissolution on Rh， Ir， and Pt-Rh alloy electrodes［J］. J Electrochem Soc， 1966， 113（7）： 739.
50	MILES M H， KLAUS E A， GUNN B P， et al. The oxygen evolution reaction on platinum， iridium， ruthenium and their alloys at 80 ℃ in acid solutions［J］. Electrochim Acta， 1978， 23（6）： 521-526.
51	PING Y， NIELSEN R J， GODDARD W A. The reaction mechanism with free energy barriers at constant potentials for the oxygen evolution reaction at the IrO₂ （110） surface［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2017， 139（1）： 149-155.
52	KÖTZ R， STUCKI S， SCHERSON D， et al. In-situ identification of RuO₄ as the corrosion product during oxygen evolution on ruthenium in acid media［J］. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem， 1984， 172（1）： 211-219.
53	FERRER J E， VICTORI L. Study of the oxygen evolution reaction on the iridium electrode in acid medium by EIS［J］. Electrochim Acta， 1994， 39（5）： 667-672.
54	LEDENDECKER M， GEIGER S， HENGGE K， et al. Towards maximized utilization of iridium for the acidic oxygen evolution reaction［J］. Nano Res， 2019， 12（9）： 2275-2280.
55	ZHU J Y， XUE Q， XUE Y Y， et al. Iridium nanotubes as bifunctional electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution and nitrate reduction reactions［J］. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces， 2020， 12（12）： 14064-14070.
56	FU L， CAI P， CHENG G， et al. Colloidal synthesis of iridium-iron nanoparticles for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution［J］. Sustainable Energy Fuels， 2017， 1（5）： 1199-1203.
57	JIANG B， GUO Y， KIM J， et al. Mesoporous metallic iridium nanosheets［J］. J Am Chem Soc， 2018， 140（39）： 12434-12441.
58	WU X， FENG B， LI W， et al. Metal-support interaction boosted electrocatalysis of ultrasmall iridium nanoparticles supported on nitrogen doped graphene for highly efficient water electrolysis in acidic and alkaline media［J］. Nano Energy， 2019， 62： 117-126.
59	JIANG B， WANG T， CHENG Y， et al. Ir/g-C₃N₄/nitrogen-doped graphene nanocomposites as bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting in acidic electrolytes［J］. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces， 2018， 10（45）： 39161-39167.
60	ROY S B， AKBAR K， JEON J H， et al. Iridium on vertical graphene as an all-round catalyst for robust water splitting reactions［J］. J Mater Chem A， 2019， 7（36）： 20590-20596.
61	XUE Q， GAO W， ZHU J， et al. Carbon nanobowls supported ultrafine iridium nanocrystals： an active and stable electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction in acidic media［J］. J Colloid Interface Sci， 2018， 529： 325-31
62	HARTIG-WEISS A， MILLER M， BEYER H， et al. Iridium oxide catalyst supported on antimony-doped tin oxide for high oxygen evolution reaction activity in acidic media［J］. ACS Appl Nano Mater， 2020， 3（3）： 2185-2196.
63	BOSHNAKOVA I， LEFTEROVA E， SLAVCHEVA E. Investigation of montmorillonite as carrier for OER‍［J］. Int J Hydrogen Energy， 2018， 43（35）： 16897-16904.
64	ZHANG J， WANG G， LIAO Z， et al. Iridium nanoparticles anchored on 3D graphite foam as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for excellent overall water splitting in acidic solution［J］. Nano Energy， 2017， 40： 27-33.
65	XIE Y， SU Y， QIN H， et al. Ir-doped Co₃O₄ as efficient electrocatalyst for acidic oxygen evolution reaction［J］. Int J Hydrogen Energy， 2023， 48（39）： 14642-14649.
66	CAO L， LUO Q， CHEN J， et al. Dynamic oxygen adsorption on single-atomic ruthenium catalyst with high performance for acidic oxygen evolution reaction［J］. Nat Commun， 2019， 10（1）： 4849.
67	KÖTZ R， LEWERENZ H J， STUCKI S. XPS studies of oxygen evolution on Ru and RuO₂ anodes［J］. J Electrochem Soc， 1983， 130（4）： 825.
68	KONG X， XU K， ZHANG C， et al. Free-standing two-dimensional Ru nanosheets with high activity toward water splitting［J］. ACS Catal， 2016， 6（3）： 1487-1492.
69	SUN Y， HUANG B， LI Y， et al. Trifunctional fishbone-like PtCo/Ir enables high-performance zinc-air batteries to drive the water-splitting catalysis［J］. Chem Mater， 2019， 31（19）： 8136-8144.
70	KÖTZ R， STUCKI S. Oxygen evolution and corrosion on ruthenium-iridium alloys［J］. J Electrochem Soc， 1985， 132（1）： 103.
71	ZHANG T， LIAO S A， DAI L X， et al. Ir-Pd nanoalloys with enhanced surface-microstructure-sensitive catalytic activity for oxygen evolution reaction in acidic and alkaline media［J］. Sci China Mater， 2018， 61（7）： 926-938.
72	PI Y， SHAO Q， WANG P， et al. General formation of monodisperse IrM （M=Ni， Co， Fe） bimetallic nanoclusters as bifunctional electrocatalysts for acidic overall water splitting［J］. Adv Funct Mater， 2017， 27（27）： 1700886.
73	LIM J， YANG S， KIM C， et al. Shaped Ir-Ni bimetallic nanoparticles for minimizing Ir utilization in oxygen evolution reaction［J］. Chem Commun， 2016， 52（32）： 5641-5644.
74	CHEN D， ZHANG P， FANG Q， et al. Coordination-supported organic polymers： mesoporous inorganic-organic materials with preferred stability［J］. Inorg Chem Front， 2018， 5（8）： 2018-2022.
75	FU L， CHENG G， LUO W. Colloidal synthesis of monodisperse trimetallic IrNiFe nanoparticles as highly active bifunctional electrocatalysts for acidic overall water splitting［J］. J Mater Chem A， 2017， 5（47）： 24836-24841.
76	KWON T， HWANG H， SA Y J， et al. Cobalt assisted synthesis of IrCu hollow octahedral nanocages as highly active electrocatalysts toward oxygen evolution reaction［J］. Adv Funct Mater， 2017， 27（7）： 1604688.
77	LV F， FENG J， WANG K， et al. Iridium-tungsten alloy nanodendrites as pH-universal water-splitting electrocatalysts［J］. ACS Cent Sci， 2018， 4（9）： 1244-1252
78	FENG J， LV F， ZHANG W， et al. Iridium-based multimetallic porous hollow nanocrystals for efficient overall-water-splitting catalysis［J］. Adv Mater， 2017， 29（47）： 1703798.
79	PARK J， SA Y J， BAIK H， et al. Iridium-based multimetallic nanoframe@nanoframe structure： an efficient and robust electrocatalyst toward oxygen evolution reaction［J］. ACS Nano， 2017， 11（6）： 5500-5509.
80	JIN Z， LV J， JIA H， et al. Nanoporous Al-Ni-Co-Ir-Mo high-entropy alloy for record-high water splitting activity in acidic environments［J］. Small， 2019， 15（47）： 1904180.
81	ZHANG J， CHEN Z， LIU C， et al. Hierarchical iridium-based multimetallic alloy with double-core-shell architecture for efficient overall water splitting［J］. Sci China Mater， 2020， 63（2）： 249-257.
82	LI L， WANG P， SHAO Q， et al. Recent progress in advanced electrocatalyst design for acidic oxygen evolution reaction［J］. Adv Mater， 2021， 33（50）： 2004243.
83	FORGIE R， BUGOSH G， NEYERLIN K C， et al. Bimetallic Ru electrocatalysts for the OER and electrolytic water splitting in acidic media［J］. Electrochem Solid-State Lett， 2010， 13（4）： B36.
84	YAO Q， HUANG B， ZHANG N， et al. Channel-rich RuCu nanosheets for pH-universal overall water splitting electrocatalysis［J］. Angew Chem Int Ed， 2019， 58（39）： 13983-13988.
85	YANG J， JI Y， SHAO Q， et al. A universal strategy to metal wavy nanowires for efficient electrochemical water splitting at pH-universal conditions［J］. Adv Funct Mater， 2018， 28（41）： 1803722.
86	LI Y， ZHOU W， ZHAO X， et al. Donutlike RuCu nanoalloy with ultrahigh mass activity for efficient and robust oxygen evolution in acid solution［J］. ACS Appl Energy Mater， 2019， 2（10）： 7483-7489.
87	WANG L， SAVELEVA V A， ZAFEIRATOS S， et al. Highly active anode electrocatalysts derived from electrochemical leaching of Ru from metallic Ir_0.7Ru_0.3 for proton exchange membrane electrolyzers［J］. Nano Energy， 2017， 34： 385-391.
88	WANG X， ZHONG H， XI S， et al. Understanding of oxygen redox in the oxygen evolution reaction［J］. Adv Mater， 2022， 34（50）： 2107956.
89	SHI Q， ZHU C， DU D， et al. Robust noble metal-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction［J］. Chem Soc Rev， 2019， 48（12）： 3181-3192.
90	SEITZ L C， DICKENS C F， NISHIO K， et al. A highly active and stable IrOx/SrIrO₃ catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction［J］. Science， 2016， 353（6303）： 1011-1014.
91	SHANG C， CAO C， YU D， et al. Electron correlations engineer catalytic activity of pyrochlore iridates for acidic water oxidation［J］. Adv Mater， 2019， 31（6）： 1805104.
92	SHIH P C， KIM J， SUN C J， et al. Single-phase pyrochlore Y₂Ir₂O₇ electrocatalyst on the activity of oxygen evolution reaction［J］. ACS Appl Energy Mater， 2018， 1（8）： 3992-3998.
93	SHI Z， WANG X， GE J， et al. Fundamental understanding of the acidic oxygen evolution reaction： mechanism study and state-of-the-art catalysts［J］. Nanoscale， 2020， 12（25）： 13249-13275.

[1]	Ning YUAN, Jie MA, Jin-Ling ZHANG, Jian-Sheng ZHANG. Preparation of PCN-6（M） Bimetallic Organic Framework Materials by Steam-assisted Method and Their CO₂ and CH₄ Adsorption Performance [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2023, 40(6): 896-903.
[2]	Lu-Fei WANG, Meng-Meng ZHEN, Bo-Xiong SHEN. Research Progress of Controlling Lithium-Sulfur Batteries by Electrocatalysts under Lean Electrolyte Conditions [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2023, 40(2): 188-209.
[3]	Zhi-Peng DU, Yang ZHOU, San-Gen ZHAO. Synthesis， Crystal Structure and Birefringence Properties of Silver Cluster Compound Ag₃B₆O₁₀I [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2023, 40(2): 229-235.
[4]	Hui LU, Jiang LI, Li-Hua WANG, Ying ZHU, Jing CHEN. Researsh Progress of Photocatalytic Applications of Atomically Precise Coinage Metal Nanoclusters [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(11): 1652-1664.
[5]	Xue-Xian YANG, Jian ZHANG, Zhi-Gang GU. Surface‑Coordinated Metal‑Organic Framework Thin Film HKUST‑1 for Optoelectronic Applications [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(7): 1013-1025.
[6]	Qian ZHU, Xiang-Yan HOU, Ke-Ke HUANG. Antitumor Nanomaterials [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(6): 1011-1012.
[7]	Mei-Lun ZHANG, Hong-Ran LING, Zai-Chun SUN, Bing-Chu MEI, Wei-Wei LI. Research Progress on the Preparation Methods of BaMgF₄ Powders [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(6): 900-911.
[8]	Wei-Jin CAO, Lu BAI, Lan-Lan WU, Jing-De LI, Shu-Yan SONG. Multi⁃Shell Hollow Nickel⁃Cobalt Bimetallic Phosphide Nanospheres for Highly Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(4): 666-672.
[9]	WANG-Xin, ZHANG-Dong, DU-Fei. Recent Progress of Single⁃Atom Catalytic Materials for Lithium⁃Sulfur Batteries [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(4): 513-527.
[10]	Qi ZHANG, Qian ZHANG, Xiao-Meng SHI, Ya-Qi KONG, Ke-Xin GAO, Ya-Ping DU. Research Progress of Rare Earth Bromides Based Solid Electrolytes for All⁃Solid⁃State Batteries [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(4): 585-598.
[11]	Yi-Ying ZHANG, Cui-Yan LI, Jie ZHAO, Xiao-Ming YU, Qian-Rong FANG. Porphyrin⁃Sulfide⁃Based Covalent Organic Frameworks as Oxygen Reduction Reaction Electrocatalysts [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(4): 647-656.
[12]	Xiao-Feng WU, De-Shun CHEN, Wei MA, Ke-Ke HUANG. WO₃/Fe₂TiO₅ Composite Photoanode Deposited via Electrospray for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(4): 694-696.
[13]	Chun-Mei ZHAO, Xiu-Miao ZHOU, Xi-Xi JIN, Yu-Hang WANG, Yi-Jing DANG. Preparation of Saddle-Shaped Cyclooctatetrathiophene-Based Hybrid Nanomaterials and Fluorescence Properties [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(02): 283-288.
[14]	ZHU Meng-Meng, BAI Jue-Yao, CHEN Ren-Jie, LI Hui-Li. Synthesis and Properties of B-Site Doped All-Inorganic Perovskite Quantum Dots [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2021, 38(12): 1541-1555.
[15]	WANG Sen, PANG Ran, LI Da, LI Cheng-Yu, ZHANG Hong-Jie. Synthesis and Luminescence Properties of a Single-Phase White-Emitting and Tunable Color Phosphor Na₃Sc₂(PO₄)₃∶Tm³⁺,Dy³⁺ [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2021, 38(11): 0-0.

Research Progress of Noble Metal Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Environment

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 93

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments