Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 1721-1731.DOI: 10.19894/j.issn.1000-0518.240169
• Full Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Lan-Lan ZENG, Ling-Ling LIU(), Hong-Bin HUANG, Shi-Bo HUANG, Li-Jun WEN, Ze-Pai LI
Received:
2024-05-27
Accepted:
2024-11-10
Published:
2024-12-01
Online:
2025-01-02
Contact:
Ling-Ling LIU
About author:
liull@carslan.com.cnCLC Number:
Lan-Lan ZENG, Ling-Ling LIU, Hong-Bin HUANG, Shi-Bo HUANG, Li-Jun WEN, Ze-Pai LI. Optimized Preparation and Application of Natural Film-Forming Agent Based on Mixture Design of Experiment[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2024, 41(12): 1721-1731.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://yyhx.ciac.jl.cn/EN/10.19894/j.issn.1000-0518.240169
Sample name | Liquid-solid ratio (mL∶g) | Extraction temperature/℃ | Extraction time/h | Ultrasound time/min |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tremella fuciformis | 50∶1 | 80 | 1 | 50 |
Bletilla striata | 60∶1 | 50 | 2 | 60 |
Peach gum | 80∶1 | 100 | 3 | 50 |
Table 1 Optimum extraction conditions of polysaccharides from three kinds of plants
Sample name | Liquid-solid ratio (mL∶g) | Extraction temperature/℃ | Extraction time/h | Ultrasound time/min |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tremella fuciformis | 50∶1 | 80 | 1 | 50 |
Bletilla striata | 60∶1 | 50 | 2 | 60 |
Peach gum | 80∶1 | 100 | 3 | 50 |
Test number | A w(Tremella fuciformis)/% | B w(Bletilla striata)/% | C w(Peach gum)/% | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TS/MPa | E/% | CA/(o) | ||||
1 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 165.00 | 58.78 |
2 | 75.00 | 25.00 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 206.09 | 73.81 |
3 | 75.00 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 1.66 | 133.74 | 75.00 |
4 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 191.48 | 72.98 |
5 | 50.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 3.51 | 125.00 | 78.49 |
6 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 50.00 | 1.61 | 125.92 | 87.66 |
7 | 25.00 | 75.00 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 121.43 | 62.20 |
8 | 25.00 | 50.00 | 25.00 | 3.54 | 101.00 | 76.56 |
9 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 50.00 | 3.32 | 115.32 | 86.17 |
10 | 25.00 | 0.00 | 75.00 | 1.40 | 156.84 | 92.06 |
11 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 45.42 |
12 | 0.00 | 75.00 | 25.00 | 2.07 | 86.04 | 61.21 |
13 | 0.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 2.79 | 153.26 | 73.41 |
14 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 75.00 | 2.32 | 197.34 | 85.50 |
15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.71 | 223.53 | 87.92 |
16 | 33.30 | 33.30 | 33.30 | 3.69 | 105.56 | 84.81 |
17 | 66.70 | 16.70 | 16.70 | 3.01 | 140.43 | 81.55 |
18 | 16.70 | 66.70 | 16.70 | 3.12 | 93.05 | 63.11 |
19 | 16.70 | 16.70 | 66.70 | 2.58 | 142.11 | 90.07 |
Table 2 Mixing experiment design and results
Test number | A w(Tremella fuciformis)/% | B w(Bletilla striata)/% | C w(Peach gum)/% | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TS/MPa | E/% | CA/(o) | ||||
1 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 165.00 | 58.78 |
2 | 75.00 | 25.00 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 206.09 | 73.81 |
3 | 75.00 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 1.66 | 133.74 | 75.00 |
4 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 191.48 | 72.98 |
5 | 50.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 3.51 | 125.00 | 78.49 |
6 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 50.00 | 1.61 | 125.92 | 87.66 |
7 | 25.00 | 75.00 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 121.43 | 62.20 |
8 | 25.00 | 50.00 | 25.00 | 3.54 | 101.00 | 76.56 |
9 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 50.00 | 3.32 | 115.32 | 86.17 |
10 | 25.00 | 0.00 | 75.00 | 1.40 | 156.84 | 92.06 |
11 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 45.42 |
12 | 0.00 | 75.00 | 25.00 | 2.07 | 86.04 | 61.21 |
13 | 0.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 2.79 | 153.26 | 73.41 |
14 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 75.00 | 2.32 | 197.34 | 85.50 |
15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.71 | 223.53 | 87.92 |
16 | 33.30 | 33.30 | 33.30 | 3.69 | 105.56 | 84.81 |
17 | 66.70 | 16.70 | 16.70 | 3.01 | 140.43 | 81.55 |
18 | 16.70 | 66.70 | 16.70 | 3.12 | 93.05 | 63.11 |
19 | 16.70 | 16.70 | 66.70 | 2.58 | 142.11 | 90.07 |
Index | Types of models | Equation of regression | S | R2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1(TS) | Cube | Y1=1.586 1A+0.485 1B+0.785 9C+9.713AB+1.8AC+8.501BC+13.88ABC | 0.114 459 | 0.990 9 | 0.986 3 | 0.969 9 |
Y2(E/%) | Cube | Y2=167.11A-0.56B+221.68C+432.3AB-267.3AC+164.5BC-1 628.9ABC | 2.695 48 | 0.998 1 | 0.997 2 | 0.994 0 |
Y3(CA) | Square | Y3=59.92A+43.28B+89.58C+84.28AB+50.99AC+30.91BC | 2.459 08 | 0.972 6 | 0.962 0 | 0.925 2 |
Table 3 Summary of regression equation model of evaluation index evaluation index
Index | Types of models | Equation of regression | S | R2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1(TS) | Cube | Y1=1.586 1A+0.485 1B+0.785 9C+9.713AB+1.8AC+8.501BC+13.88ABC | 0.114 459 | 0.990 9 | 0.986 3 | 0.969 9 |
Y2(E/%) | Cube | Y2=167.11A-0.56B+221.68C+432.3AB-267.3AC+164.5BC-1 628.9ABC | 2.695 48 | 0.998 1 | 0.997 2 | 0.994 0 |
Y3(CA) | Square | Y3=59.92A+43.28B+89.58C+84.28AB+50.99AC+30.91BC | 2.459 08 | 0.972 6 | 0.962 0 | 0.925 2 |
Source | df | Seq SS | Adj SS | Adj MS | F | p | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | |
Regression | 6 | 6 | 5 | 17.02 | 46 813.8 | 2 789.51 | 17.02 | 46 813.8 | 2 789.51 | 2.84 | 7 802.3 | 557.90 | 216.6 | 1 073.87 | 92.26 | ** | ** | ** |
Linear | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.45 | 19 587.2 | 2 075.54 | 0.96 | 39 855.5 | 1 634.7 | 0.48 | 19 927.7 | 817.35 | 36.72 | 2 742.76 | 135.16 | ** | ** | ** |
Quadratic | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15.20 | 22 097.4 | 713.97 | 7.88 | 23 097.8 | 7 13.97 | 2.63 | 7 699.3 | 237.99 | 200.45 | 1 059.69 | 39.36 | ** | ** | ** |
AB | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7.48 | 8 381.6 | 461.25 | 5.52 | 10 936.7 | 553.09 | 5.52 | 10 936.7 | 553.09 | 421.41 | 1 505.28 | 91.46 | ** | ** | ** |
AC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.31 | 13 693.5 | 178.33 | 0.19 | 4 182 | 202.43 | 0.19 | 4182 | 202.43 | 14.48 | 575.59 | 33.48 | ** | ** | ** |
BC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7.41 | 22.3 | 74.38 | 4.23 | 1 583.3 | 74.38 | 4.23 | 1 583.3 | 74.38 | 322.81 | 217.92 | 12.3 | ** | ** | ** |
ABC | 1 | 1 | - | 0.37 | 5 129.2 | - | 0.37 | 5 129.2 | - | 0.37 | 5 129.2 | - | 28.44 | 705.95 | - | ** | ** | - |
Residual error | 12 | 12 | 13 | 0.16 | 87.2 | 78.61 | 0.16 | 87.2 | 78.61 | 0.01 | 7.3 | 6.047 | ||||||
Total | 18 | 18 | 18 | 17.18 | 46 900.9 | 2 868.12 |
Table 4 Analysis of variance for the regression model
Source | df | Seq SS | Adj SS | Adj MS | F | p | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | |
Regression | 6 | 6 | 5 | 17.02 | 46 813.8 | 2 789.51 | 17.02 | 46 813.8 | 2 789.51 | 2.84 | 7 802.3 | 557.90 | 216.6 | 1 073.87 | 92.26 | ** | ** | ** |
Linear | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.45 | 19 587.2 | 2 075.54 | 0.96 | 39 855.5 | 1 634.7 | 0.48 | 19 927.7 | 817.35 | 36.72 | 2 742.76 | 135.16 | ** | ** | ** |
Quadratic | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15.20 | 22 097.4 | 713.97 | 7.88 | 23 097.8 | 7 13.97 | 2.63 | 7 699.3 | 237.99 | 200.45 | 1 059.69 | 39.36 | ** | ** | ** |
AB | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7.48 | 8 381.6 | 461.25 | 5.52 | 10 936.7 | 553.09 | 5.52 | 10 936.7 | 553.09 | 421.41 | 1 505.28 | 91.46 | ** | ** | ** |
AC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.31 | 13 693.5 | 178.33 | 0.19 | 4 182 | 202.43 | 0.19 | 4182 | 202.43 | 14.48 | 575.59 | 33.48 | ** | ** | ** |
BC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7.41 | 22.3 | 74.38 | 4.23 | 1 583.3 | 74.38 | 4.23 | 1 583.3 | 74.38 | 322.81 | 217.92 | 12.3 | ** | ** | ** |
ABC | 1 | 1 | - | 0.37 | 5 129.2 | - | 0.37 | 5 129.2 | - | 0.37 | 5 129.2 | - | 28.44 | 705.95 | - | ** | ** | - |
Residual error | 12 | 12 | 13 | 0.16 | 87.2 | 78.61 | 0.16 | 87.2 | 78.61 | 0.01 | 7.3 | 6.047 | ||||||
Total | 18 | 18 | 18 | 17.18 | 46 900.9 | 2 868.12 |
Fig.3 Mixed surface map (A, C, E) and mixed contour map (B, D, F) of the influence of the proportion of three polysaccharides on film tensile strength, film elongation at break and film contact angle
Fig.4 The response tracking diagram and response optimization diagram of the influence of the proportion of three polysaccharides on film tensile strength (A), film elongation at break (B) and film contact angle (C)
w(warer in stratum corneum)/% | Group | 0 h | 0.5 h | 4 h | 8 h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average value | Control group | 33.45 | 54.56 | 55.83 | 54.21 |
Experimental group | 36.12 | 59.90 | 64.13 | 62.12 | |
SE value | Control group | 1.75 | 1.79 | 2.64 | 2.09 |
Experimental group | 1.63 | 1.87 | 2.08 | 2.22 | |
ΔDifference value | Control group | / | 20.6 | 22.4 | 21.2 |
Experimental group | / | 23.7 | 28.0 | 26.4 | |
Rate of change/% | Control group | / | 63.47 | 67.07 | 62.28 |
Experimental group | / | 65.93 | 77.56 | 72.02 | |
p(after use vs before use) | Control group | / | ** | ** | ** |
Experimental group | / | ** | ** | ** | |
p(control group vs experimental group) | / | * | ** | ** |
Table 5 Statistical results of the mass fraction of water in stratum corneum
w(warer in stratum corneum)/% | Group | 0 h | 0.5 h | 4 h | 8 h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average value | Control group | 33.45 | 54.56 | 55.83 | 54.21 |
Experimental group | 36.12 | 59.90 | 64.13 | 62.12 | |
SE value | Control group | 1.75 | 1.79 | 2.64 | 2.09 |
Experimental group | 1.63 | 1.87 | 2.08 | 2.22 | |
ΔDifference value | Control group | / | 20.6 | 22.4 | 21.2 |
Experimental group | / | 23.7 | 28.0 | 26.4 | |
Rate of change/% | Control group | / | 63.47 | 67.07 | 62.28 |
Experimental group | / | 65.93 | 77.56 | 72.02 | |
p(after use vs before use) | Control group | / | ** | ** | ** |
Experimental group | / | ** | ** | ** | |
p(control group vs experimental group) | / | * | ** | ** |
Group | CA/(°) | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
G1 | G2 | G3 | ||
Synthetic perspiration( | 73.71±0.70 | 81.95±0.55 | 84.28±0.20 | ** |
Synthetic sebum( | 26.71±0.51 | 28.18±0.20 | 30.15±0.15 | ** |
Table 6 Contact angle between artificial sweat and artificial sebum and liquid foundation film
Group | CA/(°) | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
G1 | G2 | G3 | ||
Synthetic perspiration( | 73.71±0.70 | 81.95±0.55 | 84.28±0.20 | ** |
Synthetic sebum( | 26.71±0.51 | 28.18±0.20 | 30.15±0.15 | ** |
Evaluation time | Evaluation dimension | D/% | [(G2-G1)/G1]/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control group G1 | Experimental group G2 | |||
Apply makeup within 30 min | 1 | 78.75 | 80 | 1.56 |
2 | 76.25 | 80 | 4.69 | |
3 | 70 | 81.25 | 13.85 | |
4 | 68.75 | 75 | 8.33 | |
5 | 66.25 | 75 | 11.67 | |
6 | 67.5 | 75 | 10.00 | |
8 h after applying makeup | 7 | 67.5 | 71.25 | 5.26 |
8 | 66.25 | 70 | 5.36 | |
9 | 65 | 67.5 | 3.70 | |
10 | 67.5 | 70 | 3.57 |
Table 7 Subjects self-rated feedback results
Evaluation time | Evaluation dimension | D/% | [(G2-G1)/G1]/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control group G1 | Experimental group G2 | |||
Apply makeup within 30 min | 1 | 78.75 | 80 | 1.56 |
2 | 76.25 | 80 | 4.69 | |
3 | 70 | 81.25 | 13.85 | |
4 | 68.75 | 75 | 8.33 | |
5 | 66.25 | 75 | 11.67 | |
6 | 67.5 | 75 | 10.00 | |
8 h after applying makeup | 7 | 67.5 | 71.25 | 5.26 |
8 | 66.25 | 70 | 5.36 | |
9 | 65 | 67.5 | 3.70 | |
10 | 67.5 | 70 | 3.57 |
1 | 索菲亚维拉, 刘经梅. 新型聚氨酯成膜剂的研制[J]. 日用化学品科学, 2009, 32(5): 22-24, 32. |
SOPHIE V, LIU J M. Research on new polyurethane film former[J]. Deterg Cosmet, 2009, 32(5): 22-24, 32. | |
2 | SUN X, WANG Z, KADOUH H, et al. The antimicrobial, mechanical, physical and structural properties of chitosan-gallic acid films[J]. LWT-Food Sci Technol, 2014, 57(1): 83-89. |
3 | WU Q, CHENG N, FANG D, et al. Recent advances on application of polysaccharides in cosmetics[J]. J Dermatol Sci Cosmet Technol, 2024, 1(1): 100004. |
4 | 杨璐敏, 熊永生, 廖灵芝. 食用菌多糖保湿功能的应用现状[J]. 中国食用菌, 2024, 43(1): 6-13. |
YANG L M, XIONG Y S, LIAO L Z. Application situation of moisture function of edible fungi polysaccharides[J]. Edible Fungi China, 2024, 43(1): 6-13. | |
5 | 王瑞, 王景媛, 郭敏, 等. 杜仲多糖的提取分离纯化、结构特征及其药理活性研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2024, 55(4): 1075-1088. |
WANG R, WANG J Y, GUO M, et al. Research progress on extraction, isolation, purification, structural features, and pharmacological activity of eucommia ulmoides polysaccharides[J]. China Tradit Herb Drugs 2024, 55(4): 1075-1088. | |
6 | 赵盈盈. 亚麻籽饼粕多糖微波辅助低共熔溶剂提取工艺优化及其生物活性研究[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2023, 34(10): 130-136. |
ZHAO Y Y. Optimization of extraction process of flaxseed meal polysaccharide by microwave-assisted deep eutectic solvent and its bioactivity[J]. China Food Addit, 2023, 34(10): 130-136. | |
7 | 陈斌. 植物多糖在化妆品中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2020, 39(4): 44-47. |
CHEN B. Research progress on the application of plant polysaccharide in cosmetics[J]. Chin Wild Plant Resour, 2020, 39(4): 44-47. | |
8 | 李源. 白及多糖/壳聚糖复合膜及双层膜的制备及性能研究[D]. 成都: 西南民族大学, 2021. |
LI Y. Preparation and evaluation of Bletilla striata polysaccharide/chitosan composite film and bilayer film[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Minzu University, 2021. | |
9 | 张闪闪. 银耳多糖成膜特性的研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2019. |
ZHANG S S. Study on film forming characteristics of Tremella polysaccharide[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agriculture University, 2019. | |
10 | 庞超明, 黄弘. 试验方案优化设计与数据分析[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2018: 337. |
PANG C M, HUANG H. Optimal design of testing scheme and data analysis[M]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2018: 337. | |
11 | 李雪, 李立郎, 王瑜, 等. D-最优混料设计优化“贵州三宝酒”配方及品质分析[J]. 食品与发酵科技, 2023, 59(1): 90-97. |
LI X, LI L L, WANG Y, et al. D-optimal mixture design to optimize the formula and quality analysis of “Guizhou Sanbao Wine”[J].Food Ferment Sci Technol, 2023, 59(1): 90-97. | |
12 | 朱利萍, 孙聪, 李开放, 等. D-最优混料设计优化速冻专用油脂乳化剂配方[J]. 中国油脂, 2023, 48(12): 102-109. |
ZHU L P, SUN C, LI K F, et al. Optimization of emulsifier formula of fast-frozen special fat by D-optimum mixture design[J]. China Oils Fats, 2023, 48(12): 102-109. | |
13 | 张曼, 邓雅妮, 龚诗媚, 等. 混料设计优化龙眼、红枣和姜粉复合果蔬粉配方[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(14): 4681-4688. |
ZHANG M, DENG Y N, GONG S M, et al. Optimization of the formulation for compound fruit and vegetable powder with Dimocarpus longan Lour., Ziziphus jujuba Mill. and Zingiber officinale Rose. by mixture design[J]. J Food Saf Qual, 2022, 13(14): 4681-4688. | |
14 | 安星亮, 赵永亮, 王欢, 等. 银耳多糖提取工艺的响应面法优化及抗氧化和保湿性研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2022, 43(15): 123-130. |
AN X L, ZHAO Y L, WANG H, et al. Optimization of extraction process for Tremella fuciformis polysaccharides by response surface methodology and its antioxidant and moisturizing properties[J]. Food Res Dev, 2022, 43(15): 123-130. | |
15 | 孙达峰, 史劲松, 张卫明, 等. 白芨多糖的连续逆流提取的工艺研究[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2006(5): 34-35. |
SUN D F, SHI J S, ZHANG W M, et al. Study on the extraction of polysaccharides from Blettila striata by the continuous counter-current equipment[J]. Chin Wild Plant Resour, 2006(5): 34-35. | |
16 | 蔡延渠, 董碧莲, 陈利秋, 等. 桃胶多糖体内外抗氧化作用的研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(13): 53-58. |
CAI Y Q, DONG B L, CHEN L Q, et al. Antioxidant activity in vivo and in vitro of polysaccharide from peach gum[J]. Sci Technol Food Ind, 2020, 41(13): 53-58. | |
17 | 张莹, 王洪源, 周宇航, 等. 超声波辅助提取和热水浸提五味子多糖的比较研究[J]. 特产研究, 2015, 37(3): 52-57. |
ZHANG Y, WANG H Y, ZHOU Y H, et al. Study on the extraction of Schisandra Chinensis Baill polysaccharides by ultrasonic wave and hot water method[J]. Spec Wild Econ Anim Plant Res, 2015, 37(3): 52-57. | |
18 | 王恒. 多糖膜的制备和成膜过程动态监测及其中试工艺研究[D]. 武汉: 湖北工业大学, 2017: 62. |
WANG H. Preparation of polysaccharides film and dynamic monitoring of film formation process and film pilot scale process research[D]. Wuhan: Hubei University of Technology, 2017: 62. | |
19 | 赵欣, 管骁. 大豆分离蛋白-水溶性大豆多糖可食性复合膜的制备与性质[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2013, 39(7): 44-49. |
ZHAO X, GUAN X. Preparation and characterization of soy protein isolates and soluble soybean polysaccharides composite film[J]. Food Ferment Ind, 2013, 39(7): 44-49. | |
20 | 孙增容. 菊芋多糖的提取及其可食性复合膜的研制[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2021. |
SUN Z R. Extraction of Jerusalem artichoke polysaccharide and preparation of its edible composite film[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agriculture University, 2021. | |
21 | 陆志航, 底烨, 沈珮琳, 等. 底妆产品体外定量测试研究[J]. 日用化学品科学, 2019, 42(7): 36-39. |
LU Z H, DI Y, SHEN P L, et al. In vitro efficacy assessment of foundation make-up products[J]. Deterg Cosmet, 2019, 42(7): 36-39. | |
22 | 郭文姣, 招敏聪, 刘裕娇, 等. 天然多糖与多元醇复配临床保湿应用研究[J]. 广东化工, 2021, 48(8): 93-95. |
GUO W J, ZHAO M C, LIU Y J, et al. Study on clinical moisture retention capacity of natural Polysaccharide combined with polyhydric alcohols[J]. Guangdong Chem Ind, 2021, 48(8): 93-95. | |
23 | 高丹丹. 普鲁兰多糖—明胶可食性膜的制备、成膜机理及应用研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2012. |
GAO D D. Studies on the production, film mechanism and application of pullulan-gelatin-based edible film[D]. Haerbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2012. |
[1] | SONG Hongwei, HUANG Hui, TAN Ning, CHENG Buming, GUO Zhongcheng. Electrochemical Behavior of Al/Pb-0.2%Ag Anode in Fluoride Ion and Sulfuric Acid [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2016, 33(12): 1455-1461. |
[2] | HUANG Xueliang1,2, ZHU Fanghua2, YANG Junxiao1, ZHANG Lin2*. Synthesis and Properties of Diethyl Tetramethyl Disiloxane Bisbenzocyclobutene and Its Polymer [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2011, 28(06): 640-644. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||