
Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 1912-1919.DOI: 10.19894/j.issn.1000-0518.210535
• Full Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Bo WANG1, Fang LUO1, Yan-Zhao SUN2(), Jing-Wen HU1, Jun-Miao LIU1
Received:
2021-11-15
Accepted:
2022-09-21
Published:
2022-12-01
Online:
2022-12-13
Contact:
Yan-Zhao SUN
About author:
sunyanzhao888@163.comSupported by:
CLC Number:
Bo WANG, Fang LUO, Yan-Zhao SUN, Jing-Wen HU, Jun-Miao LIU. Study on Membrane Blocking in Lycium Barbarum Polysaccharide Ultrafiltration Membrane Bioreactor Based on COMSOL Software[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2022, 39(12): 1912-1919.
固液比 Solid-liquid ratio/(mg∶mL) | 提取温度 Extraction temperature/℃ | 提取时间 Extraction time/min | 超声功率 Ultrasonic power/W |
---|---|---|---|
1∶6 | 20 | 10 | 10 |
1∶8 | 40 | 20 | 15 |
1∶10 | 60 | 30 | 20 |
1∶12 | 80 | 40 | 25 |
- | - | 50 | 30 |
- | - | 60 | 35 |
- | - | - | 40 |
- | - | - | 45 |
- | - | - | 50 |
Table 1 Setting of extraction process conditions of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides
固液比 Solid-liquid ratio/(mg∶mL) | 提取温度 Extraction temperature/℃ | 提取时间 Extraction time/min | 超声功率 Ultrasonic power/W |
---|---|---|---|
1∶6 | 20 | 10 | 10 |
1∶8 | 40 | 20 | 15 |
1∶10 | 60 | 30 | 20 |
1∶12 | 80 | 40 | 25 |
- | - | 50 | 30 |
- | - | 60 | 35 |
- | - | - | 40 |
- | - | - | 45 |
- | - | - | 50 |
水平 Level | 因素Factor | ||
---|---|---|---|
A温度Temperature/℃ | B压力 Pressure/MPa | C酸碱度 pH | |
1 | 25 | 0.04 | 5.0 |
2 | 30 | 0.07 | 6.0 |
3 | 40 | 0.10 | 7.0 |
Table 2 Influencing factors and levels of ultrafiltration membrane separation of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides
水平 Level | 因素Factor | ||
---|---|---|---|
A温度Temperature/℃ | B压力 Pressure/MPa | C酸碱度 pH | |
1 | 25 | 0.04 | 5.0 |
2 | 30 | 0.07 | 6.0 |
3 | 40 | 0.10 | 7.0 |
截留相对分子质量Intercept relative molecular mass/kD | 料液 Liquid | 透过液 Permeate | 截留率Retention rate/% | 膜通量 Membrane flux/(mL·cm-2·min-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
体积 Volume/L | 多糖浓度 Polysaccharide concentration/(g·L-1) | 体积 Volume/L | 多糖浓度 Polysaccharide concentration/(g·L-1) | |||
10 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.528 | 0.298 | 74.9 | 0.017 3 |
50 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.513 | 0.325 | 72.8 | 0.018 5 |
Table 3 Separation characteristics of ultrafiltration membranes
截留相对分子质量Intercept relative molecular mass/kD | 料液 Liquid | 透过液 Permeate | 截留率Retention rate/% | 膜通量 Membrane flux/(mL·cm-2·min-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
体积 Volume/L | 多糖浓度 Polysaccharide concentration/(g·L-1) | 体积 Volume/L | 多糖浓度 Polysaccharide concentration/(g·L-1) | |||
10 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.528 | 0.298 | 74.9 | 0.017 3 |
50 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.513 | 0.325 | 72.8 | 0.018 5 |
因素 Factor | 膜通量 Membrane flux/(mL·cm-2·min-1) | 截留率 Retention rate/% | |
---|---|---|---|
温度 Temperature/℃ | 25 | 0.019±0.001 2 | 85.28±0.41 |
30 | 0.028±0.001 0 | 83.16±0.59 | |
40 | 0.035±0.001 7 | 80.23±0.26 | |
压力Pressure/MPa | 0.04 | 0.017±0.000 3 | 88.86±0.73 |
0.07 | 0.021±0.000 8 | 86.94±0.85 | |
0.10 | 0.024±0.000 9 | 83.58±0.84 | |
pH | 5.0 | 0.019±0.000 5 | 85.68±1.57 |
6.0 | 0.018±0.000 4 | 86.45±1.82 | |
7.0 | 0.019±0.000 8 | 76.03±1.81 |
Table 4 Multi-factor levels of Lycium barbarum polysaccharide ultrafiltration membrane separation
因素 Factor | 膜通量 Membrane flux/(mL·cm-2·min-1) | 截留率 Retention rate/% | |
---|---|---|---|
温度 Temperature/℃ | 25 | 0.019±0.001 2 | 85.28±0.41 |
30 | 0.028±0.001 0 | 83.16±0.59 | |
40 | 0.035±0.001 7 | 80.23±0.26 | |
压力Pressure/MPa | 0.04 | 0.017±0.000 3 | 88.86±0.73 |
0.07 | 0.021±0.000 8 | 86.94±0.85 | |
0.10 | 0.024±0.000 9 | 83.58±0.84 | |
pH | 5.0 | 0.019±0.000 5 | 85.68±1.57 |
6.0 | 0.018±0.000 4 | 86.45±1.82 | |
7.0 | 0.019±0.000 8 | 76.03±1.81 |
Fig.6 Solute distribution on the surface of the ultrafiltration membranecm(mol/L) is the solute concentration on the surface of the ultrafiltration membrane; cb(mol/L)is the solute concentration in the reactor; D is the diffusion coefficient; cp(mol/L) is the solute concentration on the side after passing through the ultrafiltration membrane module; JC(mL/(cm2·min)) is the membrane flux of the solute through the boundary layer; JCp(mL/(cm2·min)) is the solute flux through one side of the ultrafiltration membrane module
堵塞模型 Clogging model | 滤饼层过滤模型 Filter cake layer filtration model | 中间堵塞模型 Intermediate blockage model | 标准堵塞模型 Standard clogging model | 完全堵塞模型 Fully blocked model |
---|---|---|---|---|
数学模型 Mathematical model | 1/Jp2=1/J02+K1t/J0 | 1/Jp=1/J0+K2t | 1/Jp2=1/ | 1/Jp/1/J0-K4t |
拟合方程 Fitting equation | y=K1x+b | y=K2x+b | y=0.5K3x+b | y=-K4x+b |
y参数 y parameter | y=J0/ | y=1/Jp | y=1/(JPJ0) | y/1/Jp |
b参数 b parameter | b=1/J0 | b=1/J0 | b=1/J0 | b/1/J0 |
x参数 x parameter | x=t | x=t | x=t | x=t |
Table 5 Constant pressure filter clogging model
堵塞模型 Clogging model | 滤饼层过滤模型 Filter cake layer filtration model | 中间堵塞模型 Intermediate blockage model | 标准堵塞模型 Standard clogging model | 完全堵塞模型 Fully blocked model |
---|---|---|---|---|
数学模型 Mathematical model | 1/Jp2=1/J02+K1t/J0 | 1/Jp=1/J0+K2t | 1/Jp2=1/ | 1/Jp/1/J0-K4t |
拟合方程 Fitting equation | y=K1x+b | y=K2x+b | y=0.5K3x+b | y=-K4x+b |
y参数 y parameter | y=J0/ | y=1/Jp | y=1/(JPJ0) | y/1/Jp |
b参数 b parameter | b=1/J0 | b=1/J0 | b=1/J0 | b/1/J0 |
x参数 x parameter | x=t | x=t | x=t | x=t |
Fig.7 Streamline diagrams of fully enclosed blades and perforated bladesA. Fully enclosed blade streamline diagram; B. Perforated blade streamline diagram
1 | 谢文, 陈华国, 赵超, 等. 枸杞多糖的生物活性及作用机制研究进展[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(5): 349-359. |
XIE W, CHEN H G, ZHAO C, et al. Research progress on the biological activity and mechanism of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides[J]. Food Sci, 2021, 42(5): 349-359. | |
2 | 王海彬, 董志军, 郭立涛, 等. 枸杞多糖对糖尿病大鼠视网膜Caspase-3、Bcl-2和Bax表达的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(20): 5070-5074. |
WANG H B, DONG Z J, GUO L T, et al. Effects of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides on the expression of Caspase-3, Bcl-2 and Bax in the retina of diabetic rats[J]. Chinese J Gerontol, 2019, 39(20): 5070-5074. | |
3 | 葛君, 刘爱琴, 黄文宇, 等. 枸杞多糖联合美沙拉嗪治疗慢性实验性结肠炎小鼠模型的实验研究[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2019, 39(11): 1366-1371. |
GE J, LIU A Q, HUANG W Y, et al. Experimental study of Lycium barbarum polysaccharide combined with mesalazine in the treatment of chronic experimental colitis in a mouse model[J]. Chinese J Integr Tradition Chinese Western Med, 2019, 39(11): 1366 -1371. | |
4 | 孙玉姣, 高润凝, 崔湘怡, 等. 枸杞多糖及其硫酸化产物的免疫调节活性[J]. 陕西科技大学学报, 2020, 38(1): 44-49. |
SUN Y J, GAO R N, CUI X Y, et al. Immunomodulatory activity of Lycium barbarum polysaccharide and its sulfated products[J]. J Shaanxi Univ Sci Technol, 2020, 38(1): 44-49. | |
5 | 胡玲玲, 乌雪燕. 枸杞多糖的水提醇沉法工艺优化[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(7): 128-133. |
HU L L, WU X Y. Process optimization of water extraction and alcohol precipitation of Lycium barbarum polysaccharide[J]. Guizhou Agric Sci, 2021, 49(7): 128-133. | |
6 | 张倩, 李书启. 不同提取方法对枸杞多糖提取率及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(3): 169-173. |
ZHANG Q, LI S Q. The effect of different extraction methods on the extraction rate and antioxidant activity of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides[J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2019, 47(3): 169-173. | |
7 | 宫春宇, 邢悦, 单佳明, 等. 玉米须多糖超滤制备工艺及成分分析[J]. 食品科技, 2020, 45(6): 249-253. |
GONG C Y, XING Y, SHAN J M, et al. Ultrafiltration preparation process and composition analysis of corn silk polysaccharide[J]. Food Sci Technol, 2020, 45(6): 249-253. | |
8 | 张婕, 李云云, 孙书培, 等. 羟基红花黄色素A的提纯新工艺研究[J]. 河南化工, 2011, 6(28): 39-42. |
ZHANG J, LI Y Y, SUN S P, et al. Study on the new purification process of Hydroxysafflor Yellow A[J]. Henan Chem Ind, 2011, 6(28): 39-42. | |
9 | 叶红, 周春宏, 曾晓雄, 等. 马尾藻多糖的膜分离纯化[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(2): 375-377. |
YE H, ZHOU C H, ZENG X X, et al. Membrane separation and purification of sargassum polysaccharides[J]. Hubei Agric Sci, 2011, 50(2): 375-377. | |
10 | 张曜武, 冯雪. 膜分离制备红松松塔多糖的研究[J]. 中国林副特产, 2013, 5: 18-20. |
ZHANG Y W, FENG X. Study on the preparation of Korean pine pine cone polysaccharide by membrane separation[J]. China Forest By-prod, 2013, 5: 18-20. | |
11 | 张涛, 章伟睿, 徐灿华, 等. COMSOL与Visual C++三维电阻抗有限元联合建模与仿真研究[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2017, 38(8): 1-4. |
ZHANG T, ZHANG W R, XU C H, et al. COMSOL and Visual C++ three-dimensional electrical impedance finite element joint modeling and simulation research[J]. Med Health Equipm, 2017, 38(8): 1-4. | |
12 | 焦会青, 盛钰, 赵成义, 等. 基于COMSOL软件的绿洲盐渍化土壤中多离子耦合运移模型构建[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(15): 100-106. |
JIAO H Q, SHENG Y, ZHAO C Y, et al. Construction of multi-ion coupled transport model in oasis salinized soil based on COMSOL software[J]. Transact Chinese Soc Agric Eng, 2018, 34(15): 100-106. | |
13 | 温文娟,刘珊,黄远丽. 苯酚硫酸法与蒽酮硫酸法测定香菇多糖含量比较[J]. 现代食品,2020(21): 177-179. |
WEN W J, LIU S, HUANG Y L. Comparison of determination of lentinan content by phenol-sulfuric acid method and anthrone-sulfuric acid method[J]. Modern Food, 2020(21): 177-179. |
[1] | HOU Shuhua, ZHENG Jifu, DONG Xue. Antifouling Properties of Poly(aryl ether ketone) Ultrafiltration Membranes by Surface-Grafting Amino Acids [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2017, 34(6): 644-648. |
[2] | Yin Xiuli, Song Yanqiu. Ultrafiltration Membrane from PVDF/PAN Blend [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 1997, 0(5): 112-114. |
[3] | Xing Lanmin, Lu Fengcai. Study on Preparation and Characterization of Polyphenylquinoxaline Ultrafiltration Membrane Containing Biphenylene [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 1994, 0(3): 16-20. |
[4] | Wu Guanying, Sun Benhui, Guo lin, Shen Yibing, L? Suwei, Dai Weiguo. INFLUENCES OF THE SOLVENT EVAPORATION RATE ON THE PREPARATION OF PVC UF MEMBRANE [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 1988, 0(5): 48-52. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 899
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 381
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||