沸石型金属有机框架因为其具有高孔隙率、可控的孔尺寸、规则的孔形状以及高的热稳定性和化学稳定性而被广泛研究,此类材料在碘的快速富集方面表现出潜在的应用前景。 本文通过模拟沸石的结构特点,分别利用2,5-噻吩二羧酸和4,4'-二苯醚二甲酸作为辅助配体合成两个四面体四氮唑框架(TTF-8和TTF-9)。 单晶X射线衍射测试表明TTF-8属于四方晶系,具有 P42mc空间群,而TTF-9属于单斜晶系,具有 P21/c空间群。 值得注意的是尽管TTF-8和TTF-9具有相同的BCT拓扑类型,但是其框架和孔道结构完全不同,而且两个四面体四氮唑框架均展示了优异、快速的碘吸附性能。
Zeolitic metal-organic frameworks(MOFs) with high porosity, controlled pore size, regular pore shape, high thermal and chemical stability have been extensively studied and display potential applications in the field of rapid accumulation of iodine. Here, through simulating the structure of zeolite, two tetrahedral tetrazolate frameworks(TTF-8 and TTF-9) were successfully assembled via using thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylate and 4,4'-oxybisbenzoic acid as an auxiliary ligand, respectively. The results of single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurement show that TTF-8 crystallizes in a tetragonal space group of P42mc, while TTF-9 exhibits a monoclinic space group of P21/c. Remarkably, although TTF-8 and TTF-9 exhibit the same BCT topology, their frameworks and pore structures are entirely different. Two TTFs materials display outstanding performance on rapidly enriching iodine.
Owing to their intriguing architectures, large surface areas, and tunable pore size and shape, metal-organic frameworks(MOFs) have received tremendous attention over the past decade[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Through simulating the structure of zeolite, the assembly of zeolitic MOFs has attracted more extensive attention[13,14,15,16,17]. One key reason is that this kind of functional material not only shows the high porosity of MOF material but also possesses high thermal and chemical stability of zeolites[18]. As we know, employing the tetrahedrally coordinated divalent cations(M2+=Zn2+ or Co2+) and univalent imidazolate to replace TO4(T=Si4+, Al3+, or P5+, etc.) building blocks of zeolite is an effective strategy for fabricating zeolite-like structures. On the other hand, tailoring or altering organic component can often achieve awide exploration of diverse structures during the synthetic process of MOFs[19,20,21,22,23]. As a universal combination strategy, zeolitic MOFs are also constructed by using tetrahedrally coordinated divalent cation as the metal center and univalent imidazolate, triazolate or tetrazolate derivative as the linker[24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. On the other hand, as an important radioactive element, it is necessary to absorb I2 for purpose of avoiding serious environmental pollution. The irregular pores and little adjustable porosity of activated carbon and porous silica hinder their performances on adsorbing iodine species. As mentioned above, zeolitic MOFs are one type of the most promising materials because of high specific surface area, unique architecture, controlled pore size and regular shape of pore.
In our previous work, we successfully employed isonictinate as auxiliary ligand to construct tetrahedral imidazolate frameworks with dmp, dia and neb topology, respectively[22]. As a continuous work, we report here two tetrahedral tetrazolate frameworks(TTFs) with zeolitic BCT topology, namely, [N(CH3)4][Zn2(atz)3(thb)] guest(TTF-8, atz=5-amino-1 H-tetrazole, thb=thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylate) and [N(CH3)4][Zn2(atz)3(obb)] guest(TTF-9, H2obb=4,4'-oxybisbenzoic acid)(Scheme 1). Notably, although these TTFs exhibit the same BCT topology, their frameworks and pore structures are entirely different. Remarkably, two TTFs materials display outstanding performance on rapidly enriching iodine.
All reagents and solvents with analytic grade for the synthesis in this work were purchased from Energy Chemical Corporation and Beijing HWRK Chemical Co.,Ltd in China and used as received.
Diffraction data were collected by using a computer-controlled XCalibur E CCD diffractometer(Agilent, America) with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation( λMo Kα=0.071073 nm) at T=293.2 K. The phase purity and the structural integrity of experimental samples were determined by MiniFlex2 X-ray diffractometer(XRD, Rigaku, Japan) using Cu Kα( λ=0.1542 nm) radiation. The diffractometer data were recorded for 2 θ values from 3° to 50° at a scanning rate of 1°/min. Thermogravimetric analysis(TGA, Netzsch, Germany) was carried out on a Netzsch STA449C equipped with a platinum pan at a heating rate of 15 ℃/min in N2 atmosphere.
A mixture of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O(0.1600 g, 0.54 mmol), pyrazine(0.0300 g, 0.37 mmol), 5-amino-1 H-tetrazole(atz, 0.0500 g, 0.59 mmol), thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylic acid(thb, 0.0560 g, 0.33 mmol), tetramethylammonium bromide(0.0300 g, 0.20 mmol), methanol(3 mL) and N, N-dimethylacetamide(DMA, 3 mL) in a 23 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel was heated at 120 ℃ for 36 h, and then cooled to room temperature. The resulting transparent colorless crystals(TTF-8) were obtained, washed with acetone, and dried at room temperature. TTF-9 was obtained by the similar method as described for TTF-8 except for using 4,4'-oxybisbenzoic acid(obb, 0.0800 g, 0.31 mmol) instead of thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylic acid.
Tetragonal, M=553.1, a=b=2.15065(16) nm, c=1.02633(9) nm, V=4.7471(7) nm3, T=293(2) K, space group P4(2)mc, Z=4, 8440 reflections measured, 3862 independent reflections( Rint=0.1128). The final R1 values were 0.1128( I>2 σ( I)). The final wR( F2) values were 0.2765( I>2 σ( I)). The goodness of fit on F2 was 1.072.
Monoclinic, M=639.21, a=1.02628(4) nm, b=3.5575(4) nm, c=1.82706(15) nm, V=5.5614(8) nm3, T=293(2) K, space group P21/c, Z=4, 12063 reflections measured, 8132 independent reflections( Rint=0.0515). The final R1 value was 0.0771( I>2 σ( I)). The final wR( F2) value was 0.1872( I>2 σ(I)). The goodness of fit on F2 was 1.027.
Colorless crystals of TTF-8 and TTF-9 were solvothermally prepared, respectively. With the purpose of achieving the charge-balancing of compounds, N(CH3
![]() | Fig.1 The coordination environment of the zinc atom and bridging mode( A), the building block( B) and view of the 3D framework( C) of TTF-8. Hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity |
TTF-8 crystallizes in a tetragonal space group of P42mc. In the structure of TTF-8, Zn(Ⅱ) ion adopts a tetrahedral coordination mode and is connected by three atz ligands and one thb ligand(Fig.1 A). The deprotonated atz ligand just uses two N donors to bridge two Zn(Ⅱ) sites, and the thb linker bridges two Zn centers. Six Zn centers are bridged by six atz ligands to generate a 6-membered ring, which is further linked by atz ligand to form a channel unit(Fig.1 B). Such Zn-atz channels are further linked by the thb ligands into a three-dimensional framework(Fig.1 C). It is worth noting that three types of channels are fabricated with vertex-sharing fashion to form the three-dimensional open framework of TTF-8.
By employing obb to replace thb, another zeolitic framework TTF-9 is obtained under a similar reaction condition. Comparatively, the structure of TTF-9 shows low symmetry in monoclinic P21/c. TTF-9 exhibits the similar coodination environment of TTF-8, where Zn(Ⅱ) ion is 4-connected by three atz ligands and one obb ligand to form tetrahedron geometry(Fig.2 A). The deprotonated atz and obb ligand act as linear linkers to bridge one Zn1 and Zn2(Fig.2 B). If obb linkers serve as the pillars, atz ligands adopt a μ2-1,4 bridging mode to link two Zn atoms and resulted in a wavy honeycomb-like Zn-atz layer along the b-axis(Fig.2 C). As shown inFig.2 D, the adjacent layers are bridged by auxiliary obb linkers along the b-axis, which produces a three-dimensional network.
It is obvious that there are many structural differences between TTF-8 and TTF-9. Although their coordination environment and bridging mode are similar, further analysis reveals that the Zn-atz-Zn angles are entirely different. The Zn-atz-Zn angles in TTF-8 are 112.7°, 112.7° and 113.7°, respectively, which lead to a one-dimensional channel as building block(Fig.3 A and Fig.3 C). Different Zn-atz-Zn angles(109.2°, 109.9° and 114.2°) in TTF-9 bring a layer as unit(Fig.3 B and 3 D). The thb and obb link these two types of units, respectively, which produce two different structural features with the same topology. Both TTF framework topologies are identified as the 4-connected net with the symbol BCT(vertex symbol:4·65) by reducing each Zn site as the 4-connected node(Fig.3 E and Fig.3 F).
Investigating the performance of absorbing I2 was finished by means of immersing 100 mg of single crystals of TTF-8 and TTF-9 in a cyclohexane solution of I2(0.1 mol/L), respectively. The dark red solutions of I2 faded slowly to pale brown with the colour of crystals changing from colorless to dark brown(Fig.4 A and Fig.S5 A in Supporting Information). The mass of TTF-8 and TTF-9 after loading iodine increased by ca. mass fraction 23.3% and 18.1%, respectively. As depicted inFig.4 B(and Fig.S5 B in Supporting Information), when the compounds with encapsulated I2 were put into the ethanol(EtOH), the color of EtOH extract changed from colorless to pale brown, which shows that I2 sorption is reversible. The releasing process of I2 was further investigated by the following method with a non-aqueous solution. Very little I2-loaded single crystals of TTF-8 or TTF-9 were placed in 9 mL ethanol, and the iodine content was estimated by UV/Vis spectroscopy at room temperature(Fig.4 C and Fig.S5 C in Supporting Information). The absorbance of I2 extracted into ethanol at 288 nm and 360 nm normally increases within 50 minutes. The dynamic equilibrium of the release and adsorption of I2 is reached about 1 hour(Fig.S6 and Fig.S7 in Supporting Information)
In summary, the synthesis of zeolitic framework with BCT topology is implemented via the strategy of using dicarboxylic acid as auxiliary ligand. The different structural feature deriving same coordination environment and bridging mode proves that secondary ligands(thb and obb) can alter the structures of TTFs. Both TTF-8 and TTF-9 display performance of rapid accumulation of iodine. This work provides a new approach toward the construction of novel zeolite-type framework materials.
The Supporting Information [ PXRD, TGA, Releasing I2 of TTF-8 and TTF-9] is available free of charge on the website of Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry(http://yyhx.ciac.jl.cn)
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|