应用化学 ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1035-1045.DOI: 10.11944/j.issn.1000-0518.2017.09.170180

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

溶剂控制的铜基金属-有机框架物的合成与荧光性能

王雨桐a,范卫东a,肖振宇a,黄招娣a,徐林a,张亮亮a,邢立学b,戴昉纳a*(),孙道峰a*()   

  1. a中国石油大学(华东) 山东 青岛 266580
    b黄岛出入境检验检疫局 山东 青岛 266555
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-26 接受日期:2017-06-23 出版日期:2017-08-31 发布日期:2017-08-31
  • 通讯作者: 戴昉纳,孙道峰
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(21571187)

Solvent-Dependent Synthesis and Fluorescent Properties of Cu(Ⅱ) Metal-Organic Frameworks

WANG Yutonga,FAN Weidonga,XIAO Zhenyua,HUANG Zhaodia,XU Lina,ZHANG Lianglianga,XING Lixueb,DAI Fangnaa*(),SUN Daofenga*()   

  1. aChina University of Petroleum(East China),Qingdao,Shandong 266580,China
    bHuangdao Entry -Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau,Qingdao,Shandong 266555,China
  • Received:2017-05-26 Accepted:2017-06-23 Published:2017-08-31 Online:2017-08-31
  • Contact: DAI Fangna,SUN Daofeng
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.21571187)

摘要:

金属-有机框架物在荧光识别领域表现出良好的应用前景,为探究合成更为精确识别的物质,本文利用二羧酸配体(H2PAIA=5-丙酰胺基间苯二甲酸)和硝酸铜通过溶剂调控合成了两例结构不同的铜基金属-有机框架物(MOFs) {[Cu(PAIA)(H2O)]·2H2O}(1)和{[Cu3(PAIA)2(DMSO)(Pyridine)1.5]}(DMSO:二甲基亚砜;Pyridine:吡啶)(2)。 尽管由相同的金属离子和有机配体构筑而成,但显示出具有显著溶剂导向特征的不同框架结构:配合物1为三维NbO型拓扑结构,而配合物2为二维sql型拓扑结构。 正是由于这些结构上的差异,导致两个配合物的荧光识别性能和疏水性能展现出显著的不同。 配合物1能够同时识别Pb2+和Ag+离子,而配合物2只能识别Pb2+,对Ag+没有明显的信号响应。 配合物1的疏水角85.06°比配合物2的52.71°有显著的增加。

关键词: 溶剂调控, 金属有机框架物, 拓扑分析, 荧光性能, 疏水性能

Abstract:

Metal-organic frameworks have promising potentials of for applications in the areas of fluorescence recognition. To explore more accurate identification of synthetic substancess, we synthesized two copper metal-organic frameworks(MOFs), {[Cu(PAIA)(H2O)]·2H2O}(1) and {[Cu3(PAIA)2(DMSO)(Pyridine)1.5]}(2)(H2PAIA=5-(propionyl-λ2-azanyl)isophthalic acid; DMSO=dimethyl sulphoxide), by the solvothermal reaction in the presence of H2PAIA under different solvents(H2O and DMSO/H2O). Synthetic investigations and structural analyses reveal that both MOFs show distinct frameworks with remarkable solvent-directed feature, although they are assembled from the same starting materials, i.e., Cu(NO3)2·3H2O with H2PAIA for complexes 1 and 2. The topological structures and fluorescent properties of the two coordination compounds show a significant difference. Complex 1 is a three-dimensional NbO-type topology, while the complex 2 is a two-dimensional sql-type topology. Complex 1 exhibits fluorescent recognition to both Pb2+ and Ag+ ions, while complex 2 exhibits fluorescent recognition of Pb2+ ion. The water contact angle for complex 1 is 85.06°, while the water contact angle for complex 2 is 52.71°.

Key words: solvent control, metal-organic frameworks, topology analysis, fluorescence properties, hydrophobic properties